Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks


Trading for Sean Payton vs Settling for Steve Wilks  

91 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Trading for Sean Payton
      64
    • Settling for Steve Wilks
      27


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Mage said:

Man, this city deserves Wemby.  

As crazy as it sounds, he'd be an even bigger star than Cam Newton.  Potential to be the greatest Charlotte pro player ever.  Prayers that he can stay healthy at his size though.

 

Knowing our luck though I bet we don't get him.

I haven't followed the NBA I'm years but that guy looks like a complete freak. He's like Giannis but even freakier. Like something produced in a lab specifically designed to dominate at basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mage said:

Man, this city deserves Wemby.  

As crazy as it sounds, he'd be an even bigger star than Cam Newton.  Potential to be the greatest Charlotte pro player ever.  Prayers that he can stay healthy at his size though.

 

Knowing our luck though I bet we don't get him.

This upcoming NBA draft is a two player one, Wemby and Scoot Henderson. The Hornets will get pick 3 at best.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Steve Wilks.  I really don’t think this is going to end up with him as the hire if Sean Payton wants this job.  Payton can build a pro staff quickly with his experience and he probably removes a lot of guess work for Tepper.  
 

For those thinking Payton is pulling some Saints loyalist hose job don’t understand his ego.  He would come here to win a championship.  He will reveal in beating everyone in this division…mostly the Saints.

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...