Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With our second pick in the draft…


JawnyBlaze
 Share

Recommended Posts

So we’ve discussed which QB we should take in the first. I was thinking about what we should do in the second assuming we get an offensive minded HC, don’t trade up in the first and have to settle for Richardson or Levis.
 

We have #s 39 and 60 in the second. A guy that’s been mentioned around here some that I’m enamored with is Michael Mayer. The chances are pretty low he’ll be available at 39 so I was thinking about the idea of trading up to the mid 20s with our two second round picks. What do you guys think?  Would our two seconds be enough to go high enough to get him?  Some mocks I’ve seen him as high as 15 but most are in the 25-28 range.  Would you love that move or just really like it?  I’d love it.

What if some team falls in love and takes him in the top ten or so, what about trading our second and a third or something to move up to 30 or 31 for the second TE?  I’ve been thinking we’re primed to move up from 39 into the bottom of the first to take someone that could make an immediate impact, like a blue chip TE. Is there anyone you guys would wanna make that move for if Mayer is gone?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the sims will change but you can get a DE, a TE like Latu or Kincaid in the 2nd, and maybe LB Jack Campbell with out 3rd. Pretty even draft talent wise between picks 10-3rd round. Some have Jalin Hyatt still available at 39 as well, that's the kinda burner we need at WR to clear space in the middle for whatever TE's we have in the middle

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shaq said:

I like Kincaid in the second with no trade up, gotta feeling Mayer ain’t making it to the lower half of 20.

Yeah I want a DE and a TE/WR/LB whatever is there with our 2 2nd rounders. No one is that great to trade up for in this draft. Or you get your DE/TE/WR in the first and grab Hooker with one of the 2nds and see if he can do the Tennessee thing in the NFL, worth a gamble in the 2nd. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No to trading the two seconds for Mayer.  He won’t fall that far and we need both second round picks.

Quintin in the first, Kincaid at 39 and either Tanner McKee or Hooker at 60.  This assumes we snag either Kafka or Steichen as HC, to develop Corral, McKee or Hooker.

Sign Carr (preferred) or Minshew (consolation prize) or Darnold to be the bridge QB.  Will be interesting to see who Kafka or Steichen would want as the bridge QB.  For all our Huddle navel gazing, the opinion of Kafka or Steichen is all that really matters.  

 

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...