Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich New Head Coach


NJPanthers12
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Yup, every team has some sort of holes. Locking down the QB spot makes it a lot easier to actively target and fill those holes. We've built a good base and its a very friendly spot to Develop a young guy in. Time to go get your guy.

The plan has been clear and further solidified by hiring Reich..  Oline solid, firm foundation on defense and a HC who specializes on offense and developing QB’s..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Agree to disagree. Darnold is trash. Don’t my want his ass on my team anymore. Hopefully Reich and co is smart enough not to have anything to do with him. Which I think they are. Darnold has shown nothing since he has been in the league. 
I don’t understand why any Panthers fan wants him back. But we do like mediocrity and going back to stuff that doesn’t work. So I am not surprised people seem to think Darnold will STILL work out despite 5 years showing he won’t. 

He was 4-2 in 6 starts that isn't mediocre. His passer rating was 92 which is above mediocre. So no he sure sucked last year but he was actually a bright spot this year. Even against Pittsburgh and Tampa he had passer ratings of  108 both games. That is above mediocre.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, panthers55 said:

He was 4-2 in 6 starts that isn't mediocre. His passer rating was 92 which is above mediocre. So no he sure sucked last year but he was actually a bright spot this year. Even against Pittsburgh and Tampa he had passer ratings of  108 both games. That is above mediocre.

 

And in three of those wins he had passing totals of 43, 120, and 164 yards.  Also passer rating by itself can be a bit misleading because there is no eye test component, it's just a stat driven metric.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, panthers55 said:

He was 4-2 in 6 starts that isn't mediocre. His passer rating was 92 which is above mediocre. So no he sure sucked last year but he was actually a bright spot this year. Even against Pittsburgh and Tampa he had passer ratings of  108 both games. That is above mediocre.

spacer.png

Go Away GIF

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, frankw said:

Again his passing rating of 92 included this with the Saints. Shows how really good he did the other 5 games. But lets only ficus on the one bad game and not the others typically huddle illogic to fit the agenda.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

And in three of those wins he had passing totals of 43, 120, and 164 yards.  Also passer rating by itself can be a bit misleading because there is no eye test component, it's just a stat driven metric.  

It the best stat to compare qbs given it takes into account numerous things.  And he only does what the OC calls. He can't help we ran like crazy against Detroit. He was a game manager and did what he could to win. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/27/2023 at 12:48 AM, Asaria said:

Awww poor Wilks fan is mad that his butt buddy didn't get the job.

It's ok, just close your eyes when Reich goes for it on 4th and 1 at Midfield instead of punting, I know it will be very traumatizing for you otherwise.

So we gonna win the division next year with Reich? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

The rumors are Kevin Patullo, Jason Michael, and Brian Johnson since they have some type of connection to Frank’s offense and are in position to be promoted. A few people on Twitter mentioned Parks Frazier but I think it’s too early in his career and he didn’t exactly do so well in his interim role.

AC/DC's Brian Johnson considers retirement | Noticias | Agencia Peruana ...

I can't imagine the plays getting called in at a normal volume.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this hire.  And in a way it seems like karma that Reich gets a chance to be the first HC hired during the cycle, which gives him the ultimate jump on assistant coaches.  This is in complete contrast to when he went to the Colts and was the last coach hired and part of the staff was already hired by Josh McDaniels...who pulled out of the job.

I certainly hope Tepper opens up his wallet to secure quality assistants.  It can make or break a regime.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You Wilks haters are weird.

We easily make the playoffs if Wilks was the coach the entire season.

Yall make the fanbase look bad trashing this dude. Wilks was a class act the entire time. 

Hmm, maybe.  I think we only win at most 2 more games, and perhaps only that browns game because remember Darnold was hurt.  That may have been enough with tiebreakers.

Wilks is was a fine coach but it makes sense to go in a different direction on the other side of the ball.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to compete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...