Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would you give the bears for #1 pick


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

They aren’t going to take Burns. You could get Will Anderson instead in the draft by dropping to 3 or 4 and getting extra picks and not have to pay to DE money for Burns. 
 

Offer two first, two seconds and a third somewhere and I bet they take the bait. 
 

The Bears dream would be trade back to 2 with the Texans who get their guy and then trade back to 4 with the Colts so they get their guy. You get extra picks, and still get Carter or Anderson. And if they felt comfortable with trading back to us that’s three future firsts or seconds and still getting a top guy in this draft PLUS they have the most money to spend in free agency. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

 

The Bears dream would be trade back to 2 with the Texans who get their guy and then trade back to 4 with the Colts so they get their guy. You get extra picks, and still get Carter or Anderson. And if they felt comfortable with trading back to us that’s three future firsts or seconds and still getting a top guy in this draft PLUS they have the most money to spend in free agency. 

Yeah I think highest we could get is 3 from Arizona. I think the Bears/Texans/Colts wanna stay in the top 4. Something crazy usually happens though, someone decides to go WR or OT instead of QB/DE and all the sudden everything is up in the air

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jmac said:

Is it worth 2 firsts...first and 2nd with a third...or much more then this?

Will Fitts have the balls to make the move? Will F.R push for this trade?

What u got?

if it's a sure thing, everything we got from san fran since they're trying to stock pile, and our first this year. maybe fourth and fifth next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Holiday said:

1st this year and Brian Burns. That’s a good damn offer. A pro bowl DE is easily worth 2 firsts 

lol that Bears would hang up on Fitt if he actually offered them this

The Bears just traded away Smith because they didn't want to give him a massive contract while in a re-build, why would they take Burns knowing they'd need to give him basically that same type of contract when they could just get a whole bunch of picks from someone else and draft players on rookie deals in the first for a few years.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

with three 1’s you’re only giving up two players, especially palatable given how teams are no longer scared to make acquisitions through other means-which is even more feasible because your highest paid position is on his rookie contract

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Doc Holiday said:

1st this year and Brian Burns. That’s a good damn offer. A pro bowl DE is easily worth 2 firsts 

wouldn't take it.

Problem with these trade hypotheticals is that fans look at all 1st the same and view trades in a vacuum.

Burns might be worth two 1st but what type of team usually makes that trade?  A good team, that thinks they are a player to two away.  Those type of teams are usually picking at the end of the round.

How many teams picking in the top 10 this year would give up their next two first?  probably not many.

So Burns plus #9 is really more like a top 10 pick this year and like a 24-32 pick the next two years.

Also its not just if our offer is fair, its how it compares to other teams.  What if Indy offers #4 plus their next 2 1st round picks?  They probably view that a lot better than #9 and Burns.  There is a good chance those two future picks will be top-10 type of picks.

Don't get me wrong, I think Burns is valuable but it would probably be more like 1st and 2nd this year, Burns, and a future 2nd.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd do this EXACT same thing next year for Drake Maye or that class. There's nobody this year that's a clear #1QB lock. Maybe Stroud, but that's it and I'm on the Will Levis bandwagon as top value.

Coach sounds like he wants a top five defense before worrying so much about offense. Smart. So this year Id draft Myles Murphy by moving up a spot or two.

Or sit at nine and get Tyree Wilson a 6'6 275 quick agile DE monster also OR 6'4" WR Quinton Johnston.

Run Corral to see if he's up to task. If he's not go ALL THE WAY OUT on homeboy Drake Maye. Lots of ways to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After listening to Morgan's presser twice, I came away with some key beliefs. First of all, I don't think he's a bullshitter. What you see is what you get. When he says something, he means it.  The Teppers really have evolved as owners. Morgan has mentioned how they're easy to work with--a pleasure to work with a few times now. There seems to be a good relationship between all of them (and include Dave Canales on that). We'll see if it lasts. Yes, no one wanted to come to Carolina with the previous management, but that seems to have changed. The team signed arguably the top Edge, LB and OT on the market, two of them on pretty good deals and one on what I'll say is "not a bad one." And, credit Sunshine Dave "Flowers and Cotton Candy" Canales for helping to change the culture. Morgan mentioned getting guys--and I'm paraphrasing--that are not only great football players but great people. Don't look for us to be acquiring any James Pearce types anytime soon, just saying. We'll see if that holds true in the future. Dan Morgan really has set up the Panthers to take the BPA/BAP. He mentioned it at least a couple of times, and he doesn't seem pressured to pinpoint a particular position. He just wants quality players that will help the team. This is how it's going to be (to your joy or dismay, probably for as long as he's here), and personally I love it. Many of us know how Morgan was when he played: aggressive! That's what he's going to be when making acquisitions. He explicitly said it, and emphasized it. All avenues are open (think FA, waivers...the draft)! Personally, as long as it's controlled aggression and not reckless aggression, I love it.  On KP: "Mobility is big in this league."  He basically says if another QB is the BPA while drafting--we're going by our board, people--we're going to add them.        ...  
    • Canes are so fascinating. Despite inconsistent defense and poor goalie play they keep winning. 
    • I like Morgan's approach but I'll wait for a few winning seasons before giving too much praise.
×
×
  • Create New...