Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even if we trade up to #1....


tarheelfan23
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

please provide a detailed explination an analysis as to why you believe AR will be better than those two.

or are you just rolling with "he's dat dude bruh, look at him run. youtube highlights be lit".

His defense of Matt Rhule was "he can just coach".

I think you can see where this is headed 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

Mahomes is not a running QB - he is a mobile QB.  That is a pass-first QB who runs at times when he scrambles and occasional designed runs.  They have roll out plays as a standard of their game.  Russell Wilson, younger Rogers, Mahomes, Trevor

A running QB runs as a primary function of his game - RPO, designed runs.  Cam Newton, Lamar, Vick, RGIII

Hurts MAY have success long term as a running QB, but so far he has 2 seasons....longevity and consistency is always the issue.  If he loses the SB he would be 2-2....don't crown him yet.

You said no running QB have post seasons success. Which is false. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not a Colin Cowherd fan but I caught the end of his show and he said that he has a inside source within the Bears front office and he said they are definitely going to try and trade Justin Fields.

 

Give me Fields all day over Richardson or Levis.

Whoa whoa whoa. Fields is trending downward and has failed to cash in on his upside. Why are you salivating over another potential Sam, Baker, failed QB?

I'd rather bank on Levis or Richardson reaching their potential rather than someone who has had their chance and failed to take advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

Running QB's don't win in the post season.....never have....doesn't look like they will any time soon.  And AR doesn't look even close to ready.  HARD PASS

I don't think we should take AR at 1, but the running QBs in the postseason talk is very dated.  We have Hurts (who is probably the 2nd/3rd best runner out of all of the QBs in the NFL) and Mahomes (who can run we needed) in the Super Bowl this year.  Cam took us to the big game which involved several post season wins.  Russ Wilson was running pretty often when they won the Super Bowl.  

The thought on AR is fixing his footwork and making him a QB with a cannon who can also beat you with his legs when needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You trippin!

 

Fields would go #1 if he was in this draft. People saying he can't pass is false. He passed well in college when he had a Oline and WR's. Something he doesn't have in Chicago.

 

Even on a bad roster Fields has shown signs of potential. He will only get better when Chicago decides to give him some help.

Exactly why people are scared of QBs from stacked frontrunner program squads. They have to adjust their game to not having the best linemen, receivers etc. Fields had to try to make that adjustment in the NFL while guys not on superstar squads like Levis and Corral had to lead their receivers, be super accurate and as careful as possible because the margin of error for THEIR team against the SECs best was razor thin, so more impressive, more ready for a team who's margin of error due to NFL level competition is already razor thin too.

Adversity. Hopefully your QB has already had some and developed his callus.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

i want the highest ceiling because i think we have the coaching staff to reach it. 

He has the highest ceiling because he made some circus throws and runs?

Did you watch Stroud vs the juggernaut of college football?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don't think we should take AR at 1, but the running QBs in the postseason talk is very dated.  We have Hurts (who is probably the 2nd/3rd best runner out of all of the QBs in the NFL) and Mahomes (who can run we needed) in the Super Bowl this year.  Cam took us to the big game which involved several post season wins.  Russ Wilson was running pretty often when they won the Super Bowl.  

The thought on AR is fixing his footwork and making him a QB with a cannon who can also beat you with his legs when needed.  

Running QBs can't throw.

Multiple people have tried to explain this to you.

 

A QB that can beat you from the pocket but can run when he wants is not a running QB. He is a mobile QB.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
    • I understand tempering expectations, but there are some issues with his points. Walker was a 3 year starter, but Green Bay let him walk and no other team was quick to snatch him up. That says something. Freeling will compete to start. With Hunter, we rotate our linemen and even 5th round pick Cam Jackson played some meaningful snaps last year. Both Brown III and Wharton have underwhelmed since we picked them up. Hunter is a run plugger that we have needed. Hunter will play early, even if he isn't the "starter." Brazzell was described as one of Canales' favorite prospects in the draft and he has a speed element we have been missing. I think Canales is going to have plays drawn up with Brazzell on the field just out of pure excitement. It will be up to Brazzell to prove he can handle it, though. If he can, he will play. As far as our secondary picks, yeah they have to earn their stripes and Evero tends to lean on veterans. So they might take time, but if they can show they can play, they will see the field. Smith-Wade and Ransom did. Sam Hecht simply has to show he can handle the mental side of the NFL game. If he can, he is in a direct competition with Fortner, who's also relatively young, but also on his 3rd NFL team and doesn't have the power profile of Hecht.  I can appreciate that Gantt wants to pour cold water on what was perceived as an impactful draft, but facts are facts.
×
×
  • Create New...