Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic talks about who our OC could be as of now……

WarPanthers89

By WarPanthers89,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

The Athletic may be a bit shortsighted on the Eagles staff front. 

They've got Kevin Patullo & Jason Michael who could both be OC candidates.  Both have strong connections to our new staff, mainly Reich and our passing game guys.  

Jason Michael had a few years of OC experience at age 28 in TEN for Wiz (I still find that crazy), direct ties with Reich in SD and IND.   I'm a fan of his.       

Joe Person must have written this article 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brooklyn 3.0 Grand Master

Brooklyn 3.0

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, scratched said:

OC in KC hasn't gotten him a HC job yet. Prove his ability in Carolina and he is immediately a front runner for several HC jobs. Just a thought

IF he gets to call plays here. Reich might do the same thing Reid does to him in KC. Where would you rather play "call deliverer", with Mahomes or with uh ... um ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turtle Collaborator

Turtle

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Don't feel too good about this Cooter guy. I'd much rather go with the younger talent in Philly

Cooter’s offenses were characterized by a lot of passing and not much in the way of a run game. The Lions ranked ninth, 11th and sixth in passing offense in Cooter’s first three seasons but were 32nd, 30th and 32nd in rushing over the same span. Cooter’s game plans resulted in 1,000-yard receiving seasons for Golden Tate and Marvin Jones, but Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford took a beating. Stafford was sacked an average of 42 times while Cooter was the Lions’ offensive coordinator, including a career-high 47 in 2017.

In regards to “younger talent”

Jim Bob Cooter - 38 years old

Brain Johnson - 35 years old

admittedly Jim Bob does have an 82 y/o front porch get-off-my-lawn-type ring to it 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Turtle said:

In regards to “younger talent”

Jim Bob Cooter - 38 years old

Brain Johnson - 35 years old

admittedly Jim Bob does have an 82 y/o front porch get-off-my-lawn-type ring to it 

Yeah I guess I mean in Cooter has had a lot more opportunity to showcase his talents and he's still just kinda where he was 10 years ago. Johnson has been ascending for the past few years. And didn't creep any women out by climbing through their windows or whatever Cooter did before someone told him to stop being a dumbass. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Turtle Collaborator

Turtle

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I guess I mean in Cooter has had a lot more opportunity to showcase his talents and he's still just kinda where he was 10 years ago. Johnson has been ascending for the past few years. And didn't creep any women out by climbing through their windows or whatever Cooter did before someone told him to stop being a dumbass. 

Fair enough. Definitely like Johnson’s trajectory, probably my 1A.

Ya.. that whole window thing was awkward to say the least, had forgotten that honestly.

Staff is rounding out well, either would be ok with me. I think if Jim Bobs the guy Reich and Duce will be more involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
3838 Mentor

3838

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, Turtle said:

In regards to “younger talent”

Jim Bob Cooter - 38 years old

Brain Johnson - 35 years old

admittedly Jim Bob does have an 82 y/o front porch get-off-my-lawn-type ring to it 

Or......" We ain't puttin up with that 'round here"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...