Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In-Depth Film Evaluation on QB Anthony Richardson


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, heel31ok said:

I think RB,WR are way bigger needs than TE, but we can 

Address all those 

Positions easily.

After watching last season you're more concerned with our RB's and WR's than TE? If you get a legit Olsen/Kelce/Kittle everything else opens up. I'd take AR over any of those positions if he's there at 9 in this draft. Seems like it's shaping up to pick 5-40 are about the same year one impact unless you are severely lacking at a certain position

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

After watching last season you're more concerned with our RB's and WR's than TE? If you get a legit Olsen/Kelce/Kittle everything else opens up. I'd take AR over any of those positions if he's there at 9 in this draft. Seems like it's shaping up to pick 5-40 are about the same year one impact unless you are severely lacking at a certain position

Yes I am , we need  another rec and a rb.

The te play was directly affected by who was in charge of the offense.I dont have any doubts the new regime can utilize them more effectively.Sure we can upgrade as that goes along the same line of thinking I have for the oline.Moving to the next tier but if we dont I think the coaching change alone will show the real reason you were disappointed in the TE play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO you have to go into the selection of a QB thinking that they won’t improve. From there you gotta think if what they are now will succeed in the NFL or not.

Mental processing speed isn’t something that can be easily coached in or trained. Typically players who can’t handle the speed coming in, never can.

Accuracy isn’t easily fixed as you are trying to change someone’s deep rooted muscle memory. Typically inaccurate passes will remain at the bottom the passing stats.

Same with physical, everyone has a limit so making a dramatic improvement on their manoeuvrability is very unlikely.

This is why a smart offensive coach and system is so critical as they excel at putting players in positions that prioritises their strengths and hides weaknesses.

So, if AR made marginal improvements on his game… but largely remained what he is, would he win games and potential of a Super Bowl?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, toldozer said:

Teams are going to try to outsmart everyone else and Levis and AR will go before Stroud. My best case scenario is those two ball out at the combine and Stroud is a bit lackluster.

Honestly dream scenario. Stroud is my favorite of the bunch, would love that to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Saca312 said:

At this point, it seems highly unlikely the Panthers will have a shot at moving to where they can grab Stroud or Young. With the non-QB needing teams who want to trade also likely to more enamored by one of the top defensive prospects, teams ahead will likely get either Young or Stroud before the Panthers have a shot.

Resultingly, that leaves the likes of Anthony Richardson and Will Levis.

With the Combine underway, the hype for Richardson should soar if past history should repeat itself. His athletic potential will be off the charts, and once his film is dissected, may be more favorable to be one of top eight QBs picked.

With Richardson and Levis most likely within firing range, I figured I'd search around for any film evaluation on him.

Ian Wharton does the job again, dissecting all of Richardson's games from last year. He has a different, more optimistic outlook on Richardson, in which he may be more pro-ready and fixable early than thought. His highs, obviously, are tops in the league, and the prevailing question is whether he can put it together early.

Similarly to Cam Newton, seems Richardson may have a bit of misconceptions about his game. He is a better passer than given credit for, and seems a lot of issues stemmed from Florida's more QB-less friendly scheme and bad luck.

Sure, he has work to do with mechanics and high throws. That has been highlighted, but he also shows a lot of good too - more than most would think.

Overall, these seem to be Ian's thoughts and I certainly think he brings forth a good perspective. Feel free to grant your own opinion too and look through this thread, it's full of great stuff.

If the Panthers do not get Stroud or Young, I certainly wouldn't mind Richardson. Funnily enough, I'd be content with any of the top 4 QBs, as I feel all have great potential to be the future. With the Panthers coaching staff and direction, any QB chosen will have a great situation to grow and improve, and despite Richardson's raw attributes, everything appears coachable and I'd say potentially ready by day one.

I watched a lot of Billy Napier offense the past five years. There is nothing "unfriendly" about that offense. Sorry, if Levi Lewis can throw for almost 3,000 yards and run for a few hundred at 5'10 at Louisiana while Richardson completes 52% of his passes, that's a Richardson issue.

That offense is all bootlegs, play action, and spacing. It's not hard. It's not unfriendly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bobcat91 said:

He is an awful quarterback. Period.

He wasn't great or even good, but he has the enticing tools. The question is whether or not our guys think that they can fix him. Some QBs can be fixed to a franchise level like Allen and Hurts. I'm not saying that AR can, but maybe Reich and company will. I will criticize them if he turns out to be a bust though, as valuable draft capital is too important to simply waste on a boom-or-bust type of prospect. That's what day three is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

I thought Fitterer lit up talking about him and that extended through the comments immediately following, about the new regime and QB development. 

I've not seen him "light up" about any of these guys. I think fans of a certain prospect see what they want to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...