What if it’s not Young or CJ at #1?

[Wanderlai]

Hopefully they will take the better of the two but…it’s the Panthers so I worry

[Shocker]

[Donald LaFell]

It’d be pretty hilarious. Even though Richardson has potential it’d be a bad decision to take a guy who isn’t NFL ready at 1. 
 

I think it’d be funny if one day a team trades up to #1 only to trade down multiple times for an overall better haul. 

[NAS]

[DeSim]

then it’s not

[Hoenheim]

Just now, Donald LaFell said:

 

I think it’d be funny if one day a team trades up to #1 only to trade down multiple times for an overall better haul. 

God that would be stupid. If you're trading down after giving all that up to trade up I doubt they're going to get a better value. We would have to somehow get a future 1st rounder, two 2nds, and a player of DJs caliber to even break even with what we gave up to get to #1. You'd have to get MORE than that to make trading down even worth it.

Who the fug is giving panthers more than what we gave up to get to #1? Even two additional first rounders could be  considered breaking even if you consider DJ worth a R1 pick.  

Just a dumb ass idea.

 

[top dawg]

Then I'll be like...

[TheCasillas]

It would be Richardson. However, I’d think we try to trade back first.

[Castavar]

Then we are stupid AF

[Kentucky Panther]

[rippadonn]

[Camp Fodder]

Then Fitterer and Tepper should be fired. Yes Tepper should fire himself.  If you want Levi’s or Richardson you don’t trade to 1

[frankw]

Then...

[WarPanthers89]

Then we riot