Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if it’s not Young or CJ at #1?


Wanderlai
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Donald LaFell said:

 

I think it’d be funny if one day a team trades up to #1 only to trade down multiple times for an overall better haul. 

God that would be stupid. If you're trading down after giving all that up to trade up I doubt they're going to get a better value. We would have to somehow get a future 1st rounder, two 2nds, and a player of DJs caliber to even break even with what we gave up to get to #1. You'd have to get MORE than that to make trading down even worth it.

Who the fug is giving panthers more than what we gave up to get to #1? Even two additional first rounders could be  considered breaking even if you consider DJ worth a R1 pick.  

Just a dumb ass idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...