Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers showing interest in RB Jamaal Williams


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

we made him an offer. if he wants to be here so bad then all he has to do is docusign it.

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

When was the offer? I know we supposedly made an offer a few days ago, but Sheena Quick is implying we just made one. I could be reading her tweet wrong. 

There was an article on the team site the other day that said we had offers on the table for Bozeman and foreman.

one player has since signed, but one player hasn’t…so the ball is in foreman’s hands (pun intended)

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jamaal Williams commands 5 million or less a season on no more than a 2 year contract, I could see the Panthers interest.

But if he gets more elsewhere, then good for him. We don't want to overpay.

The FA RB pool is large and the draft is deep at RB. There will be a large supply of RBs out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

I've noticed a pattern with these FA interests.  Everyone them are known for scoring TDS.  Our guys are known for yards but few TDS. I'm smelling what Fitterer and Reich are cooking. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like Williams as a team leader and positive locker room presence; I'm a big fan and would be happy to have him as a Panther. But he's not a game changer as a running back and we certainly shouldn't break the bank for him. Hopefully the market dictates he and/or Foreman getting a very modest deal

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Yes, and signing him for that reason makes a lot of sense.

Stroud doesn't (even try) score with his legs and no one wants Young to go for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rodeo said:

he seems to be a bit of a touchdown vulture judging from his highlights. almost all of his TDs are from within the 5 and there were only a handful of big runs in the open field.

Thats the entire point.

Not to mention he had plenty of touches. Heck his rushing yards are just short of the leading receivers yardage. He was the second most productive player in the team in yards and we'll above the third place.

How does he remotely qualify as a TD vulture?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...