Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marc Ryan - "Carolina Zeroed in on Stroud and Richardson"


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Yeah, I can tell you don't watch the games because you refer specifically to college statistics instead of evaluating what's happening in each player's games.

I don't really care either way. You can go back to evaluating quarterbacks you find the hottest for all I care.

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

Edited by Bluetooth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bluetooth said:

that line he was behind couldn't hold UGA defense for 🤫🙊, and guess what they still had a hard time bringing him down. Give him Alabama or Ohio State line big difference.

And his receivers couldn't get any separation 

 

What was his excuses vs Kentucky ??

14 35 143 40.0 0 2 28 1 62.9 2.6 6 4 0.7 0 4

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

Dalton isn’t even getting a press conference and he signed today .. If they planned on him being the starter he would get more media attention..More and More it looks like the Vet Mentor and not the bridge guy waiting for the young guy to be ready…

They are drafting a day 1 starter..

Unless it's a

 never ending loop GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm almost starting to think that Richardson is our target and that's why we'd consider trading down a spot or two. We'd still be thrilled with Stroud and Young but we're really tempted to take a shot on Richardson's immense talent... but we're scared of being kicked like SF was with Mac Jones. Signing an Andy Dalton means you're not forced to play him right away.

I agree. Something tells me it’s Richardson with Dalton letting him sit the first 8 games or so. I still think it’s Stroud, but the nagging feeling that it’s Richardson is growing stronger each day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just fyi, Marc Ryan is a laughing stock to every other media personality in the state.  The guy is literally never right on anything and spends half of his day arguing with people on twitter who are constantly bumping old tweets of something he said that turned out to be complete b/s

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Sub Zero said:

You can tell this and you can tell that.. Got it..

At what point do you recognize the numbers and why they are so bad for a QB being looked at as a top 5 pick??? When does that be something you can tell??

If college numbers don’t matter why even keep records of them???

I should never see you use numbers in a debate because you watch the game and saw all the outliers and intangible situations.. (The Qb broke up with his girlfriend before the game that’s why he went 6 - 17 with no TDS vs a 1-11 mid major ) Got you..

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/4429084/anthony-richardson
 

go down this list and explain why he only completed 48% his passes when he had to see UGA..  He had a bad breakfast right?? Lmao

 

To be clear only Stroud and Richardson, period, had 250+ yards, at least one passing touchdown and no interceptions against UGA this year. That’s it. Anybody who watches Florida football year round knows this was the worst pass catching group of players we have had in ages. Both in the ability to separate and the ability to hold onto the ball. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...