Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drew Sanders vs Jack Campbell ??


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

Drew Sanders. Dude is a beast, fast,high motor and can play edge. But need to improve his tackle.

In contrast not a fans of Jack Campbell. Watch his tape (not highlight) and he is slow, out of position all the time, can't drop back cover and moving slow sideline to sideline. Not sure why everyone is high on him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Neither with our 2nd rd pick.

 

We need to get the rookie a weapon he can grow with either at WR or TE.

 

If Zay Flowers is on the board he has to be the pick. Or Kincaid at TE.

No brainer on Zay, if he is there at 39. It’s a pipe dream though. Wouldn’t mind moving up a few to grab him. Pretty sure he’s gone by pick 25.  
 

Between the two linebackers. Give me Sanders in the 2nd. Gigantic nose for the ball, will find a lane in a phone booth. Very instinctive, and agile to fight off blockers for his size.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Verge said:

I love Drew Sanders. I feel like he can be a dominant edge rusher really early.

If we were still 4-3 Campbell would be perfect to step in as the MLB, in the 3-4 Sanders is more versatile as an edge rusher/ILB combo. Imagine swapping Sanders and Luvu back and forth from OLB/ILB depending on the down. Both could stay on the field and drive OC/Qb's crazy

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

If we were still 4-3 Campbell would be perfect to step in as the MLB, in the 3-4 Sanders is more versatile as an edge rusher/ILB combo. Imagine swapping Sanders and Luvu back and forth from OLB/ILB depending on the down. Both could stay on the field and drive OC/Qb's crazy

Yeah, this.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bumper Pool made Drew Sanders. Sanders was converted to LB this past year and Pool would make the calls and cover up for Sanders on all of his blitzes. You can see Pool in many of Sanders highlights on the play or coming in to clean up the play. Sanders is athletic and needed to leave Alabama to raise his draft stock, but Bumper Pool is the real value at LB from Arkansas.

As for Sanders v Campbell, there is no doubt Campbell is ready to play LB at the NFL level and Sanders is not.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Icege said:

Was not impressed with Drew Sanders. Thought he missed a lot of tackles and got dragged a lot when trying to wrap up.

I like Jack Campbell based on measurables alone. He looked good in the Iowa defense.

I prefer Ivan Pace Jr over both of them tho! 😮

I’m sorry dude but just no, Sanders and Campbell clear Pace by a mile. There’s a reason you haven’t heard a single person mention Pace anywhere close to where Sanders and Campbell are. He is 5 ft 10 with below average wingspan, the partial edge role he played in college is not gonna be there in the NFL. Compare that to much bigger frame and more functional athleticism of Sanders and Campbell, no debate here talent evaluators across the league have spoken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, shaq said:

I’m sorry dude but just no, Sanders and Campbell clear Pace by a mile. There’s a reason you haven’t heard a single person mention Pace anywhere close to where Sanders and Campbell are. He is 5 ft 10 with below average wingspan, the partial edge role he played in college is not gonna be there in the NFL. Compare that to much bigger frame and more functional athleticism of Sanders and Campbell, no debate here talent evaluators across the league have spoken.

To avoid the typical Young/Stroud debate route where I point at the difference on the game tape and you point at the difference on the measuring tape, I'll just say that I think he'd fit the Ted LB role in the 3-4 very well and that would also protect any concerns over length + speed. He has the strength and intelligence to thrive in the role and be an outstanding on ST.

But if we are talking about who has the best film of the 3, it isn't even close: it's Pace.

Given just Sanders or Campbell tho: Campbell

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I wouldn't sleep on Henry To'o To'o. 

Or Sewell and Simpson on the inside. 

If we want an OLB or ILB one will be there @ 39 but I get the feeling offensive skill position will be the pick. 

Sanders will probably be first off the board with Campbell close behind or vice versa. 

If I'm looking for an OLB in 3-4: 

IF that's the move at 39, I'm looking for Will McDonald or Nolan Smith. Smith might slide because he's kinda small but he's so athletic he could probably line up anywhere and be productive. 

Will McDonald paired with Burns though...smdh. That could be nightmare. The run might suffer as he grows but imo he's a special talent. If he has any type of work ethic for his craft, that man will be a dominant force ... I'd bet the house on that. 

Edited by ColumbusCounty
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When Parcell’s said Bryce better “walk on water”…..the implied concern wasn’t that the tiny QB could survive being hit.  It was acknowledging he would have to be extremely special to overcome the handicaps he would face at this level.  Which he isn’t and can’t.  which isn’t just being hit.  It’s being able to play in an NFL pocket and make NFL throws from it….and that ultimately is Bryce’s problem.  He doesn’t play well from a NFL pocket and can’t make all the throws as needed.  He can’t see as others can.  Which impacts the throws he does and doesn’t take.  It also impacts him bailing and killing plays and turning them into scrambles/dead plays 
    • 9:30 kick off here in Scotland, which is better than the 01:20 early hours of Monday that I feared. Will definitely be watching, but probably wouldn't if it had been 0120 as I need to be up for work at 05:45. Falcons Saints is 6pm on the Sunday so will watch that too if it becomes relevant
    • So much revisionist history around the pre-draft Bryce hype. The media was practically united in saying that if he were a couple inches taller he'd be the perfect prospect and it was just a question of whether he'd hold up in the NFL being that small. The Panthers did not create the mythos around him they were just the team that bought in. The team was largely praised for the move after and for surrounding him with what was considered an all-star coaching staff at the time.  Yeah part of the fanbase wanted Stroud but let's be real, we're coming from an oversized franchise QB who injured himself out the league. There was some analysis here on the limitations of Bryce's game but people were mostly just concerned he was going to turn into dust when he got sacked in the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...