Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh McCown only follows one rookie QB, and only one follows Josh McCown


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is the most elaborate and far reaching smokescreen I've ever seen! You damn genius Tepper for orchestrating it so we can get Houston to trade us 12 overall and a 1st next year for #1 and we still get our guy Stroud at 2!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(sarcasm)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on Instagram I do have to say it’s really leaning that Young is the pick. 

Thielen and Chark both follow Young and Young follows them back. I have to think both of these WRs asked which QB the Panthers were drafting before signing.

Thielen does not follow Stroud nor does Stroud follow Thielen. Thielen doesn’t follow any of the other QB prospects nor do they follow him. 

Chark also follows CJ Stroud and Stroud follows him back. 

Terrace Marshall follows CJ Stroud, but Stroud does not follow him back. Marshall does not follow Young nor does Young follow him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, hepcat said:

Based on Instagram I do have to say it’s really leaning that Young is the pick. 

Thielen and Chark both follow Young and Young follows them back. I have to think both of these WRs asked which QB the Panthers were drafting before signing.

Thielen does not follow Stroud nor does Stroud follow Thielen. Thielen doesn’t follow any of the other QB prospects nor do they follow him. 

Chark also follows CJ Stroud and Stroud follows him back. 

Terrace Marshall follows CJ Stroud, but Stroud does not follow him back. Marshall does not follow Young nor does Young follow him.

amazing stuff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...