Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young, Stroud, Corral


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

It would be smart to only carry 2 QBs on the roster. You already have your franchise QB. You just need a backup and thats it. If you get down to your 3rd, your season is fuged anyway. The reason the 9ers needed more is cause they never had their franchise QB. Corral should go to the practice squad this year. If he gets taken, oh well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

The reason the 9ers needed more is cause they never had their franchise QB.

The reason the 9ers needed more is cause the first two QBs on the depth chart got hurt.

That having been said, when it comes to the Panthers roster, Corral likely doesn't have much time left to make a case for himself.  It may already be too late.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s under contract and will be QB3. If we are drafting a 185 pound QB it’s a good idea to carry a few in case something happens. Again, we won 7 games with no QB last year. We could still be lead to the playoffs with rookie, Andy or Matt in a pinch. 

Edited by Varking
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

The reason the 9ers needed more is cause the first two QBs on the depth chart got hurt.

That having been said, when it comes to the Panthers roster, Corral likely doesn't have much time left to make a case for himself.  It may already be too late.

And what do you base this on? That he never got to practice or play, or that he got injured in a preseason game with the 4th stringers?

If stupid was gold, this place would be Ft Knox.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, KillerKat said:

It would be smart to only carry 2 QBs on the roster. You already have your franchise QB. You just need a backup and thats it. If you get down to your 3rd, your season is fuged anyway. The reason the 9ers needed more is cause they never had their franchise QB. Corral should go to the practice squad this year. If he gets taken, oh well.

You don't necessarily have your franchise QB. We've seen too many high pick QBs fail. There are no guarantees in the NFL draft when it comes to making the transition from college to the pros.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...