Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Klein: strong probability Panthers trade out of #39


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’ve pretty much assumed this would be the case. It makes sense to recoup some of our trade up. I assume it would be something similar to the trade in 2021 when we had the same pick:

Bears receive:

  • 2021 second-round pick (No. 39 OT Teven Jenkins)
  • 2021 fifth-round pick (No. 151 OT Larry Borom)

Panthers receive:

  • 2021 second-round pick (No. 52 traded to Browns)
  • 2021 third-round pick (No. 83 TE Tommy Tremble)
  • 2021 sixth-round pick (No. 204 WR Shi Smith)

 

  • Pie 4
  • The D 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be mad, unless some like Kincaid or possibly Quentin Johnston are there.  At the end of the day, I probably wouldn't be upset at all. If the coaches believe there is potential day-one starter level talent later in the draft, I guess I'd have to suck it up as the cost of moving up in the first. We're going to have to try to make up some ground this draft and the next.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, run-run-pass-punt said:

Yeah, I've always felt the smart move was to move out of that spot after what we gave up to go to #1. Plenty of talent to pick up later to help the team out in exchange with a team who is desperate to get "their guy" @ 39. I sure hope we get a good trade partner to add some picks there.

Not replying to anything you posted, but your username is legendary. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm maybe I’m in the minority but I think we should trade up for a receiver 

good time to pair the rookie QB with one and also it takes time for a wr to develop generally speaking

i suppose we bought a year with what we got in FA but I would not be mad trading future picks or current picks to move up

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

I’ve pretty much assumed this would be the case. It makes sense to recoup some of our trade up. I assume it would be something similar to the trade in 2021 when we had the same pick:

Bears receive:

  • 2021 second-round pick (No. 39 OT Teven Jenkins)
  • 2021 fifth-round pick (No. 151 OT Larry Borom)

Panthers receive:

  • 2021 second-round pick (No. 52 traded to Browns)
  • 2021 third-round pick (No. 83 TE Tommy Tremble)
  • 2021 sixth-round pick (No. 204 WR Shi Smith)

 

Not the best example. We traded for 4/5 WR, a 2/3 TE snd a 3/4 WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't enter the draft with 4-6 needs and think you are going to meet them.  You are going to meet 2, maybe 3 needs.  The Panthers simply have to determine what needs are realistically met at 39 and 93.  I would say that there is more likelihood that we package 93 and 114 to move up to about 80 or so than to trade back and meet 4-5 needs.

In my view as of today (it changes), I would say the following:

1. QB

39. Edge

93. CB

I think they can take a flyer on a G at 114, but I just don't see the WR value anywhere in this draft.  I think the are going to roll with what we have, hoping better OL and QB play will improve Marshall, Shenault, etc.

If they take a G at 39, he is a starter and they are determined to protect the QB (probably Young).  Then they would move up to take a serviceable Edge and call it a day.

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok--I have seen some sample items, and I would like to see something (if possible) measures on field intelligence--maybe how quickly you can grasp a playbook or absorb film session adjustments...Back when we had Morrison as team president and Hurney as GM, I offered to assess (as part of my research in education requirement at a University) emotional intelligence and learning styles of players to help coaches teach more effectively.  Morrison loved it and contacted me about it.  Hurney was not interested, and it fell through the cracks.  My pitch?  If only 50% of first-rounders become successful NFL players and that number drops significantly, can you tell me that you are effectively measuring talent?  Morrison thought it was a good point and wanted to do something that might improve long-term success rates--that would impact the cap management, etc.  Marty, according to Morrison, said he was not interested at this time and if so, he would want a football guy to do it.  (I told Morrison that I played in college and Hurney, a sports reporter at one time, did not. He told me that Hurney played as a Guard in college--who knew?) Any way, about that time, Morrison left (2017) and the idea was dropped.  I reached back out a year later or so to Marty was still not interested.  A few days later, his wife accused him of assault or something, so I dropped it.
    • Pretty sure they still do the Wonderlic they just don't publicly release the scores.
    • I just thought he was under the radar--but thanks for opening our eyes to him.  I think we should have better measures for intelligence--such as reaction time, angles, etc. Legette is raw as heck, for example, and his RAS was very high.  We used to do the Wonderlic (which was not great) but to know how effectively a player makes on field decisions would be great.  
×
×
  • Create New...