Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers might not be picking at #1


Day1PanthersFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

The fact that they haven't confirmed the pick and informed the player, is a red flag , why keep your cards close to the chest if you are not planning a swerve, we might trade all of this years picks for a big name Veteren ,what if panther North has moved on from Josh Allen ? 

I know I am insane, but its really fishy why we haven't went public with the pick

  • Poo 35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

The fact that they haven't confirmed the pick and informed the player, is a red flag

No it isn't.

Keeping the pick a secret right till the end is actually SOP.

Yes, they could trade. I've said that all along.

I've also said all along that I don't see it happening.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

The fact that they haven't confirmed the pick and informed the player, is a red flag , why keep your cards close to the chest if you are not planning a swerve, we might trade all of this years picks for a big name Veteren ,what if panther North has moved on from Josh Allen ? 

I know I am insane, but its really fishy why we haven't went public with the pick

 Now why would we give up picks and a WR to get #1 pick just to drop back to #2 pick. This makes no sense at all. Provide the link a as proof.

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

No it isn't.

Keeping the pick a secret right till the end is actually SOP.

Yes, they could trade. I've said that all along.

I've also said all along that I don't see it happening.

Why not listen to offers til 8:14pm? Even just out of curiosity to see what the pick is worth last minute for future reference. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Why not listen to offers til 8:14pm? Even just out of curiosity to see what the pick is worth last minute for future reference. 

Absolutely. Stranger things have happened.

That's also a big reason why you don't inform the guy until the card is turned in.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's all just Bryce dragging the average down*.       *I'm joking, but there is a little bit of truth to it. A better QB would have probably thrown for 40 more yards a game which would bump up the league avg more than a yard.
    • Miller was bad again last night. The rangers fan were right. This dude is a dud. 
    • I took a look at 1990 to 2025(so far). It's an interesting look. In my eyes, I don't think there is a huge difference in the rushing output or attempts over that span. The maximum difference in the attempted rushes over that massive of a span of time was only 2.4 attempts/game. Attempts/game has been rising for the past few years but that isn't the biggest difference, it's the efficiency of those runs that is actually at historic highs over that timespan. Look at YPA averages. The same general thing happened a few years ago with the passing game. Although the range of attempted passes per game is significantly higher in this timespan(5.8 attempts/GM), it's also the efficiency of these passes that has gone up considerably over that era(but peaked a few years ago).  I don't think we are reverting to a "previous era" of offense in terms of the rushing attempts vs. passing attempts. I say that because with all the rule changes, it's sort of impossible for that to happen. What you are seeing is more likely an adjustment to the defensive changes that came about to stop the explosive passing offenses that had developed. These changes haven't led to an inordinate amount of rushing versus passing(although that ratio has dropped) but it HAS led to much more explosive rushing output as evidenced by YPA ticking up since 2018.
×
×
  • Create New...