Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official NFL 2023 Draft Discussion


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Gotta trade up for Mayer or Washington at this point. Otherwise why did we draft Young?

 

Thielen/Chark is just not enough for a rookie QB. Guys like Herbert/Burrow have 2 #1 WR's for goodness sake.

No need to trade up if you like both at #39. If that’s your move wait for one to go first 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Gotta trade up for Mayer or Washington at this point. Otherwise why did we draft Young?

 

Thielen/Chark is just not enough for a rookie QB. Guys like Herbert/Burrow have 2 #1 WR's for goodness sake.

Both those guys have been to pro bowls.  There isn’t a #1 WR left man.  Neither Mayer or Washington are dynamic pass catchers.  Looks like we will wait for now 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

Oh damn. Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison in Minnesota? That offense can be scary

I told my wife this week that Deonte Banks might be going to the Giants. I'm not going to say it felt good to say "I told you so" BUT... 👀

Buffalo trading up for Dalton Kincaid to get their TE

I feel like Dallas goes Mayer here and is quite happy about it. He can block and he can catch. Notre Dame has been solid with producing TEs the last few years.

5 picks left in the 1st. Do CAR trade up from 39 to the PHI pick @ 30? Any1 else trade up for that bonus option yr?

Does your wife care about the draft or is she a giants fan? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Kinda slow, but got it done in college. Might not translate as a receiver 

He ran a 4.7. Jason Witten ran a 4.65.  Todd Heap ran a 4.68. Those are the comps for me. Guys that don't wow you on tape with any individual play. They're average athletes with no real highlights they just block well, get open, and catch balls. Over and over and over again.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...