Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake Delhomme on Bryce Young


 Share

Recommended Posts

i've tried listening to this interview 3 times. i haven't been able to get through it because something goes nuts around me. puppy pees on the carpet, kid falls off the bike, plane crashes into house, those kinds of little annoying things. 

can someone give me a recap? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

270 subscribers..Is he just bankrolling his own radio show? It's odd that he's getting legit guests but doesn't seem to be tied to any legit radio station or network in general

His show is on air in the Greensboro/Winston Salem area. He primarily covers the Demon Deacons. He is legit good friends with Mick Mixon so thats how he maybe got his in with Panthers stuff.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i've tried listening to this interview 3 times. i haven't been able to get through it because something goes nuts around me. puppy pees on the carpet, kid falls off the bike, plane crashes into house, those kinds of little annoying things. 

can someone give me a recap? 

Nothing that hasn't already been said. In a nutshell, Jake thinks that the small frame isn't as big a deal as it's been made out to be because Young can straight up play football. Also, he's basically a football savant. Bet big on a horse names Skinner this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

Nothing that hasn't already been said. In a nutshell, Jake thinks that the small frame isn't as big a deal as it's been made out to be because Young can straight up play football. Also, he's basically a football savant. Bet big on a horse names Skinner this weekend.

i know someone on here was saying that people were saying the same things about zach Wilson tha tthey have been about Bryce Young, but NOBODY was talking about zach being as brllliant a football mind as they have been Young. People see Young's command of the game and ability to  manipulate coverages and they've been talking a lot about that. i haven't heard anyone talked about the way that Young has.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i know someone on here was saying that people were saying the same things about zach Wilson tha tthey have been about Bryce Young, but NOBODY was talking about zach being as brllliant a football mind as they have been Young. People see Young's command of the game and ability to  manipulate coverages and they've been talking a lot about that. i haven't heard anyone talked about the way that Young has.

Yeah, what intrigued me about Wilson was basically the polar opposite of Bryce Young. Wilson had that hose and the ability to throw ropes on the run. The guy had extremely intriguing arm talent.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i know someone on here was saying that people were saying the same things about zach Wilson tha tthey have been about Bryce Young, but NOBODY was talking about zach being as brllliant a football mind as they have been Young. People see Young's command of the game and ability to  manipulate coverages and they've been talking a lot about that. i haven't heard anyone talked about the way that Young has.

Wilson has the physical tools to succeed in the NFL but his ego is too big

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...