Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Underdogs


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

For the most part, the national media latches onto certain teams. Not sure how Atlanta has more talent than the Panthers. The coaching staff here is certainly better. They never expect anything from the Panthers. I guess after the last few years, its wait and see. I like their chances based on the upgrades to the roster and staff. I would feel better if they got some depth in a few places, but I just don't see any team in the division being a lot better than the others.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mydaddysmamasdaddy said:

For the most part, the national media latches onto certain teams. Not sure how Atlanta has more talent than the Panthers. The coaching staff here is certainly better. They never expect anything from the Panthers. I guess after the last few years, its wait and see. I like their chances based on the upgrades to the roster and staff. I would feel better if they got some depth in a few places, but I just don't see any team in the division being a lot better than the others.

The Falcons have dogshit on most of their defense.  They an unknown at QB.  They mostly have a dogshit coaching staff and fanbase.  They do have good weapons at TE/RB/WR.  However top to bottom I think objectively our roster clears there.  If nothing else for the talent we have all over our defense, and the potential of Bryce Young at QB.  Riddler was OK I guess last year.  Hard to say how hes going to do this year, considering he only started 3 or 4 games at the end of the year.  In those games though he was not very productive at all.  Only 2 TD passes in ~120 attempts.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a stud wr, rb and te. Some people thought highly of Desmond Ridder. He did get better during his four starts, but I doubt he ends up as a quality NFL starter. More likely the shine wears off over the course of the season and they are back to trying to find a qb. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are going to ground and pound and keep their defense off the field.  Ridder will become a game manager with running capability. 

I am concerned what we will do at NT and I am not tickled about the ILB situation.  If we are vulnerable up the middle, its going to be a long season.

On offense?  I think we will be better than advertised.  I think Marshall, Shenault, and Mingo will ball.  Chark and Theilen will do as expected. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The falcons have added a lot on defense this off-season, so they “should” be better on that side of the ball.  I think we’d be pretty hyped if we added Jessie Bates, Calais Campbell, David Onyemata, and getting a former #3 overall pick in Jeff Okudah for peanuts with a new DC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A big LOL to all of those who thought that having the number one pick would bring us into the national spotlight. National media does not give one single shite about us, who we drafted, or how we'll do this season. The only rookie QB who gets talked about is Richardson. The Saints and Falcons are the only ones in their conversation of favorites to win the NFCS. We aren't under the radar because we're not even on the radar, just like it's always been.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, X-Clown said:

The falcons have added a lot on defense this off-season, so they “should” be better on that side of the ball.  I think we’d be pretty hyped if we added Jessie Bates, Calais Campbell, David Onyemata, and getting a former #3 overall pick in Jeff Okudah for peanuts with a new DC. 

I remember when we got a former t10 CB for peanuts. Don’t mean poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joemac said:

The Falcons have dogshit on most of their defense.  They an unknown at QB.  They mostly have a dogshit coaching staff and fanbase.  They do have good weapons at TE/RB/WR.  However top to bottom I think objectively our roster clears there.  If nothing else for the talent we have all over our defense, and the potential of Bryce Young at QB.  Riddler was OK I guess last year.  Hard to say how hes going to do this year, considering he only started 3 or 4 games at the end of the year.  In those games though he was not very productive at all.  Only 2 TD passes in ~120 attempts.  

I’d like to add that Jessie Bates is also apart of that dogshit. I do not care what a Falcon fan says, he will not be missed in Cincy. His play has declined the last few seasons.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly I stick to the NFL Network for national NFL news. I have not heard any one of their analysts call for Atlanta to win the division. Not one. It's either been the Panthers or New Orleans. The Bucs have consistently been at the bottom. 

I think one of the problems analysts have when looking at the NFCS is that the Panthers have no history for them to consider. No they finished the year strong chatter. No they have a D they can build on. The only consistent from last year is our o-line and that may be in flux because of injuries. Oh, and our kicker and punter and long snapper. New head coach, 99% new staff, new QBs, new offensive weapons, new defensive alignment. We can't yet be analyzed as a whole package with history. So the analysists that are good at their jobs are looking at Frank Reich and what has been said plus each player individually. Those that are not good at their jobs are dismissing us.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, I kinda get it. The division was atrocious last year and the Falcons drafted a RB who could be among the league's best right out of the gates and they spent a ton of resources on D. So yeah, I could see the media seeing their path to winning what they expect to be a bad overall division.

We're gonna be afterthoughts until we prove that we shouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hard to interpret some of Brugler's opinions. Capable of running a robust route tree sounds like a lazy thing to say - I'm sure just about every slot TE is capable of running a full route tree... I want to know if he is currently able to (which from tape leads me to a no). Granted, it's pretty common for most receivers/TE not having a full route tree developed before they get drafted. Agility/acceleration after the catch hasn't shown up on his tape (at least his Oregon tape) for those dig/out breaking routes while it has for the seam and slant routes. Agree he has a good physical build and he is very good running seam routes. His build definitely helps him to shield defenders and create a large target point for the QB. Drops were a concern, but it could be focus drops just like T-Mac was/is prone to. Run blocking is an accurate statement, but again, we have only seen him run block in the slot/backfield - inline blocking is a whole different animal. With his athleticism, he definitely has a high ceiling. I just think he also has a low floor and don't like taking that big of a risk on a mid 1st rounder. I think this is a deep TE draft and would much rather target one in the 3rd or later. He's very boom or bust to me - bust in terms of being worth a 1st round pick, not an out of the NFL in a few years type bust. I feel like he gives me Evan Engram vibes. Not saying that Evan Engram was/is a bad NFL player, just that most people would agree he shouldn't have been drafted in the 1st.
    • I mean I would love 6-1. It’s funny the hurricanes usually dominate the first game and win by three or four goals. But keep the second game close. It would be nice if it’s the reverse of that tonight.
    • Brugler has him as TE1 and going to the Ravens in the first.  Apparently Sadiq's football IQ is pretty high (interviewed very well).  Also he was an WR and CB in high school.  This is why I always thought his route running was solid.  I'm sure it needs some polishing but for a TE it's pretty good. nfl.com Built like a bodyguard with a compact, well-defined frame. Capable of running a robust route tree. Gets in and out of breaks with good snap and separation. Vandalizes defensive seams with impunity against man coverage. Survives collisions with catches thanks to his hand strength. Shows off agility and acceleration after the catch. Fits up run blocks with proper positioning and base width. Grips and presses forward with moving feet to stay connected. -Again I don't know if we should take him but if he goes to the right team he could become a scary weapon at the next level.  I just like him as a prospect.
×
×
  • Create New...