Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL insider: Brian Burns' extension could be close to Myles Garrett's deal


 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Burns is the best we have for sure and not a bad player at all but I dont think we can compare him to Julius Peppers. He was something else all together and a freak of nature that teams had to plan for and QB's would have to watch out for on every play. We will probably have to overpay for Burns when the time comes unfortunately. I just dont see how we can comp[are Burns to Peppers at all. Pepp is hall of fame, Burns is good but I dont see him currently as hall of fame or on a hall of fame track per say

Mono took out peppers for a season and a half.  Pep was in another stratosphere when he was on.    

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns is what? 25. He isn't elite but he is a good pass rusher and is learning to be much better against the run.  He is a probowler and will get paid as such. As long as we manage the guaranteed money we can pay him a boatload which he will see if he keeps improving or may not see all of it if he drops off.  I wish more contracts were incentive based.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Burns is the 2nd best DE in Panthers history. Let that sink in.

 

You haters need to relax and find another player to hate on. Burns ain't going anywhere might as well embrace him.

No he's not, at least not totally. He's the second most athletic and maybe someday that translates to a complete package on the field, but not at this point. CJ and Rucker are both above him based on consistency, ability in both the run and pass game, and longevity.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Burns is the 2nd best DE in Panthers history. Let that sink in.

 

You haters need to relax and find another player to hate on. Burns ain't going anywhere might as well embrace him.

I dont hate him at all. He is no Peppers but he is a very solid player that we will pay a huge ransom for when he comes due. I dont know any other way around it though as I would not want to lose him even though I wish we didnt have to pay him one of the top DE's in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Burns is the 2nd best DE in Panthers history. Let that sink in.

 

You haters need to relax and find another player to hate on. Burns ain't going anywhere might as well embrace him.

Love Burns and think he deserves to get paid, but atm he is at least 4th, maybe even 5th if you count Reggie White

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Burns is the 2nd best DE in Panthers history. Let that sink in.

 

You haters need to relax and find another player to hate on. Burns ain't going anywhere might as well embrace him.

I’m with you in general in this thread but I’d still have to put Burns behind CJ and Hardy and maybe Rucker.  Still plenty of time for him to rise in those ranks though. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CJ is very underrated in our history. He was as solid and reliable a DE as you could want...and he got paid as much. well, overpaid, but that was because hurney panicked. 

Hardy has always been a headcase, but the guy was an absolute beast when he kept his poo together enough to stay on the field. 

Burns has a bit to accomplish to surpass these two, but I'm hoping that with this new coaching staff and system that he catapults into Peppers territory.

Ruckers is a legend too. Great counterpart for Peppers. Something we're still needing for Burns. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when Charles Johnson got paid and reset the DE Market? He did pretty well, good enough to almost live up to the contract. 

I think that Burns is better at this point in his career than Johnson was, and I don't think he'll get a contract that resets the market. He's a pro-bowl Pass Rusher. Those guys get paid regardless of who the team is. If we don't give him a contract, someone else will. He's more valuable to us because we have 0 other proven pass rushers on our team. 

The cap is also going up each year. I don't blink at these contracts anymore. We actually have a GM/FO that is capable of working the money into future void years, something Hurney and Gettleman were completely incapable of. 

Pay him a top 5 DE contract this season. Watch that become a top 10 DE contract next offseason. Then watch it become a top 15 contract the next year. By then he still won't even be 30, he'll be 28 and up for a potential extension. 

We may end up overpaying him, but pass rusher is one of the three positions you overpay for, OT and QB being the other two. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Pay him a top 5 DE contract this season. Watch that become a top 10 DE contract next offseason. Then watch it become a top 15 contract the next year. By then he still won't even be 30, he'll be 28 and up for a potential extension. 

We may end up overpaying him, but pass rusher is one of the three positions you overpay for, OT and QB being the other two. 

true on all of that. this is one of those contracts you just do because it's a premium position, arguably the most important/valuable next to QB. LT is close behind it. If you've got a top performer, you keep them and pay them accordingly and you know that, like you said, a top 5 paid at the position will be top 10 the next year. same with QB. The market is constantly on the uptick.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Remember when Charles Johnson got paid and reset the DE Market? He did pretty well, good enough to almost live up to the contract. 

I think that Burns is better at this point in his career than Johnson was, and I don't think he'll get a contract that resets the market. He's a pro-bowl Pass Rusher. Those guys get paid regardless of who the team is. If we don't give him a contract, someone else will. He's more valuable to us because we have 0 other proven pass rushers on our team. 

The cap is also going up each year. I don't blink at these contracts anymore. We actually have a GM/FO that is capable of working the money into future void years, something Hurney and Gettleman were completely incapable of. 

Pay him a top 5 DE contract this season. Watch that become a top 10 DE contract next offseason. Then watch it become a top 15 contract the next year. By then he still won't even be 30, he'll be 28 and up for a potential extension. 

We may end up overpaying him, but pass rusher is one of the three positions you overpay for, OT and QB being the other two. 

And you can always rework it.   The main thing I hope we are conscious of especially in light of the cmac deal is how long and how much guaranteed money is at stake.  He is going to get paid, he has all the leverage we are just hoping its not some crazy ass mega deal that could go sideways as we have seen a ton from this team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2023 at 8:20 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

And people wonder why we have a weak fanbase.

 

Fans like this who want to get rid of the homegrown talent we built up for some damn picks who we might not hit on like we did with Burns. You don't trade the guys you built up! Those are the guys you keep!

 

How do you expect to build this defense if we trading our most talented player on defense.

 

Make it make sense!

Well 1st of all, I saw the writing on the wall that Cam and CMC could not sustain the physical abuse they were receiving.  I was correct.  2nd, Burns is above average but far from elite. . .best player on the team regardless or not.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...