Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers-Charlotte current stadium agreement ends.

ladypanther

By ladypanther,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

you say this but the data tells a different story... year over year Panthers are worth more to the NFL than the following teams when its comes to total revenue:

 

  • Detroit Lions - $452 million ($114 million)
  • Cincinnati Bengals - $462 million ($89 million)
  • Arizona Cardinals - $467 million ($112 million)
  • Buffalo Bills -  $470 million ($83 million)
  • Jacksonville Jaguars -  $471 million ($114 million)
  • Tennessee Titans - $481 million ($115 million)
  • Indianapolis Colts - $484 million ($100 million)
  • New Orleans Saints - $490 million ($125 million)
  • Los Angeles Chargers - $491 million ($156 million)
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers - $492 million ($62 million)
  • Pittsburgh Steelers - $494 million ($135 million)
  • Kansas City Chiefs - $495 million ($135 million)
  • Minnesota Vikings - $500 million ($141 million)
  • Carolina Panthers - $501 million ($139 million)

What this tells us is that the Charlotte market is a very healthy Market for the NFL. They would not want to risk any transition revenue. When the Chargers and Rams moved from their original locations the NFL lost money. NFL isnt in the business to lose money.

And would the franchise make less if it moved somewhere else.

And fwiw, We have seen in the past that the NFL as a whole doesn't necessarily decide if, when and where teams move.  Usually the teams themselves decide, and the owners give assent.  And I don't remember the owners ever not giving assent if one of their fellow owners want to move.  The Chargers move was idiotic, and yet the other owners still agreed.  

  

Regardless, I don't think the team is moving.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

And would the franchise make less if it moved somewhere else.

And fwiw, We have seen in the past that the NFL as a whole doesn't necessarily decide if, when and where teams move.  Usually the teams themselves decide, and the owners give assent.  And I don't remember the owners ever not giving assent if one of their fellow owners want to move.  The Chargers move was idiotic, and yet the other owners still agreed.  

  

Regardless, I don't think the team is moving.

Raiders destination uncertain after NFL nixes LA move

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CashNewton22 Experienced

CashNewton22

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Here comes the fleecing and yet another government handout to a billionaire while that same government entity will say they don't have the funds for infrastructure and other basic community needs.

And here comes CashNewton pulling up to whatever the name of the stadium is still being a Panthers fan regardless of the situation being glad they didn’t leave lol  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thorrez Collaborator

Thorrez

Posted
Posted

With LA gone the real price is Austin/San Antonio. But there is no way that happens before while Jones is alive as it eats into "his" market.

The smart business move is to just sit for now and either move out demand a lot of money when it does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OceanPanther Mentor

OceanPanther

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Here comes the fleecing and yet another government handout to a billionaire while that same government entity will say they don't have the funds for infrastructure and other basic community needs.

The fleecing comment may be true,,  but it's also how business is done in the NFL and has been for a very long time.  We can paint Tepper a bad guy if we like, but he won't be doing anything different that the other owners do. It's just part of the having an NFL team in todays world in my opinion.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrewerHouseBeer Collaborator

BrewerHouseBeer

Posted
Posted

Pretty sure Charlotte is like the 9th largest city in the US. Could be wrong, i didn't look it up.  I know I've heard that before though. Also, Atlanta is relatively small. The difference is all of the cities/towns/areas surrounding Atlanta are also close to Atlanta's size and much bigger than the places surrounding Charlotte. This makes it way more crowded and seem like a larger city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, BrewerHouseBeer said:

Pretty sure Charlotte is like the 9th largest city in the US. Could be wrong, i didn't look it up.  I know I've heard that before though. Also, Atlanta is relatively small. The difference is all of the cities/towns/areas surrounding Atlanta are also close to Atlanta's size and much bigger than the places surrounding Charlotte. This makes it way more crowded and seem like a larger city. 

image.thumb.png.29de8ed117f0b838dad8948822242a11.png

 

image.thumb.png.3b90f1f1316a31a9a82563c845337d7e.png

https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities

Edited by ladypanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...