Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

App State QB Armanti Edwards on Michigan upset, ‘dark times’ with Panthers


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/12/2023 at 9:20 AM, Murph said:

He was mainly drafted to sell tickets? John Fox didn’t want him?  We gave ip the 33rd pick in the following draft to get that? I’m hoping he is exaggerating or was misinformed because that is horrible.

If you don't remember all of those things being said at the time, maybe you weren't as in tune. But literally each and every one of those was said in the media, in this forum, and it was assumed by the players.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettleman was a bitter little man with a power complex and no real ability. I hold him responsible for destroying Cam Newton's career by never adequately investing in protection for him.

Byron Bell started an entire season at Left Tackle in his second year. What else do you need to know about his ability to manage an NFL roster?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KatsAzz said:

(" The reason (for being released) that I got from Gettleman is that I was never the same after my aunt died.")

What a lame excuse or reason for telling a player why they were released. I feel for Edwards and the way Gettleman handled his release  and it makes him look like a jerk and a small person.

That may be revisionist history from AE. It is hard to conceive a GM telling a player that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 9:14 AM, scpanther22 said:

A lot of executives act like this and we tend to let them because we think they're the smartest person in the room  

we?

you got a mouse in your pocket?

Never in my life have I thought a football executive was the smartest guy in the room.

Unless they other people in the room were all six year olds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This upsets me. I always knew Armanti had the deck stacked against him here, but I didn't know it was that bad. It was a dream come true when we drafted him, now I wish we never did and he was given a proper chance. 

I was in Ann Arbor for the Michigan game and had season tickets through his entire collegiate career. He will always be my favorite athlete of all time regardless of his time with the Panthers. 

Edited by App Panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ladypanther said:

I believe Corral is in a good place now.  The staff will work with him and I am betting they hope he can be the #2 at some point...prob soon.  If he does well, there will be opportunities.  I think this staff can and will develop players on both sides of the ball.

Matt Corral doesn't want to be #2 QB, as a competitor I'm sure he wants to be a starter. His opportunity to start just won't be with the Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/12/2023 at 1:10 PM, CmC2k said:

I know Ron gets a lot of the blame for running Cam into the ground, but I feel that Gettleman deserves more blame for that then he currently gets. Gettleman's refusal to build the team around Cam is what forced Ron to have to make Cam carry the entire offense. 

A lot of truth to this. I'm not certain that it would've gone any different no matter what, but the way the roster was built Cam had to carry the offense. I mean, we did TRY to put some receivers around Cam, we just chose poorly with KB and Funchess. The utter failures on the OL was pathetic though. Even our studs Gettleman either inherited (Kalil) or fell backassward into with Turner (3rd rounder) and Norwell (UDFA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood how it was supposed to work, the way Gettleman had it figured. 
He was wrong, period, and should know better after spending a life in football. 
His reasoning was get a big target.

But the target being missed will just get missed higher or taller. Because inaccuracy is inaccuracy at 6’ or 7’ or 10’. You get a tall receiver you literally gain a few inches over a short one. That’s about it. If the ball is much higher no one is gonna reach it. 

If you can’t hit a target that is above sea level by 6 feet you won’t be accurate trying to hit a 7’ high target.

Because you aren’t throwing at a 6’ target anymore, and figuring you miss it by three feet so the taller longer arms guy is going to be able to reach something over the head of a shorter player, is bad figuring. 

 

I am spending hundreds of words trying to verbalize the point but basically you don't fix inaccuracy by moving the target to where the misses are. The aim will be there, and the misses will no longer miss there. 
So get me a guy who can jump and catch and separate from coverage, and get the quarterback to get his mechanics together. If he is tall, whatever, but no more lumbering natural tight ends with iffy hands in the first round, please. 
 

I loved Gettleman his first year because of the draft of two DTs where we had not had any quality since Jenkins left. And I am a believer in having big guys up front that will win the point of attack on both sides of the ball. 

Book should be written and done after his second chance in NYC was kind of more evidence against him being really good at his job. 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

Matt Corral doesn't want to be #2 QB, as a competitor I'm sure he wants to be a starter. His opportunity to start just won't be with the Panthers. 

Yea...but he has to get to #2 1st.  In that position, with a 17 game season...odds are he will get a chance to play.  If he shows he can be the guy he will get a chance and the Panthers will get some good compensation.  Win win.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

we?

you got a mouse in your pocket?

Never in my life have I thought a football executive was the smartest guy in the room.

Unless they other people in the room were all six year olds.

if it doesn't apply let it fly,  internet language 101

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ladypanther said:

Yea...but he has to get to #2 1st.  In that position, with a 17 game season...odds are he will get a chance to play.  If he shows he can be the guy he will get a chance and the Panthers will get some good compensation.  Win win.

It isn’t possible to know what the future holds but 17 games say that everyone will be needed. 
Stranger things have happened than a backup being put into the job because he was next man up. 
Kurt Warner says hi. Tom Brady is waving too. 

Edited by stratocatter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...