Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop blaming Kasey

Panther53521

By Panther53521,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jtm Rising Star

jtm

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

The Cam fumble thing is way overblown imo. 

He didn't dive on the ball for two reasons. 1. He was anticipating the ball changing direction. 2. He was too tall to just drop immediately on top of it. 

False - Cam made a business decision to not dive on the fumble and admitted this in an interview.  

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GOAT Veteran

GOAT

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Those topics have been beaten to death since the spring

you're spending your time on the wrong site if you don't wanna talk about that stuff over something that happened 20 years ago lmfao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dave-o Rising Star

dave-o

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, GOAT said:

it's 2023.

we're a couple weeks away from our new #1 pick QB and new coaching staff taking the field.

and the number one thread on this forum is about something that happened in 2003.

woo boy.

Its a Panthers message board right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, djp14 said:

I didn't like the call, but I understood it.

Up until that td drive, we had 130 yards in total offense.  And it was the 4th quarter. Bottom line, if we convert the first 2 pt conversion, we eventually have a 25-21 lead, and probably win the game. If we only converted the 2nd, we probably go to OT.

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Day1PanthersFan Veteran

Day1PanthersFan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yeah, about cheating our way to a superbowl ,cause Sauerbran and Donnely were caught using steroids, and the national media framed it like a team wide issue 

Op is right though, those 20 yards meant nothing to Brady and Welker , they were going to nickel and dime our gassed defense if they got it at the 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted
On 7/20/2023 at 11:05 AM, OneBadCat said:

Link?

He can’t provide one because it’s false. He said in an interview he anticipated it bouncing out and that’s why he raised up. He couldn’t get there before the defender that was already lower than him so he was playing the bounce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

 

Newton would go on to explain a day later: “I didn’t dive on one fumble because the way my leg was (positioned). It could have been contorted in a way. You say my effort? I didn’t dive down. I fumbled—that’s fine. That’s fine. We didn’t lose the game because of that fumble.”

https://www.si.com/nfl/2016/02/11/cam-newton-dive-fumble-super-bowl-50-carolina-panthers-nfl

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weyco2000 Mentor

weyco2000

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yep, people forget that…
If we kick the PAT’s, then NE doesn’t go for 2 and make it. That’s a 3 point swing and their final drive is for a tie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...