Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tuesday Practice Thread 8/1/23


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

image.png.8c342cf3c9b64cc4699e58ec6fc870d3.png

Confused Thinking GIF

Yeah I went through the exact same investigative thought process lol.  Cause I guess some will argue that "concern" is more of a precursor to "worry", where "concern" really just means you're paying consideration towards something, but that's a pretty fringe way to define it whereas in 99.9% of cases they're used interchangeably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're always going to have a "chick little" section on the huddle that press the panic button way too early. I can't say it's surprising considering the horrors we're been through since Cam's shoulder injury. How many Sunday's have the Panthers ruined with mismanagement? Some people are a little jumpy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interceptions were always going to be in the cards with a young QB. The question is the mental make up and ability to bounce back and tune out the mistakes. So far from what I can tell Bryce has that trait. Just have to let him develop and take his lumps that all rooks experience along the way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Saying something is concerning means I am not worried about it. 

 

39 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

You can be concerned without being worried. I am done talking about this. It is apparent some on the board just want to be an ass. (Not you)

 

36 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

image.png.8c342cf3c9b64cc4699e58ec6fc870d3.png

Confused Thinking GIF

image.gif.251a59e75bc0cb36689c073b55b21c13.gif

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Is there any intel, any comment or anything at all about Matt Corral and how he is looking, reps etc? 

On youtube guys were saying he's only getting 2 or 3 reps, I guess they're just gonna throw him out there in preseason raw again. Maybe he'll get more work next week leading up to that Jets game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

All the picks Bryce is throwing is concerning. Needs to get that out of his system. 
But it is encouraging to see the offense play well for the most part

Can't say for the one today, but all the other ones have been some type of miscommunication. They're working it out, which is pretty normal to be honest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now.  No need for us to discuss further.
    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
×
×
  • Create New...