Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Athletic: Insight to Brian Burns Contract


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

He may have been willing to but now he knows he doesn't have to. The Rams offer established value. Typically when you enter a negotiation you have a bottom line you're willing to accept. If you know the other side has a bottom line higher than yours, you move yours. You don't have to settle for less because you know they will pay more. There's a lot less pressure when you know their numbers. 

I feel like you are overthinking this.

I seriously, seriously doubt a player would somehow take less money because another team didn't offer to trade for them.  That just doesn't make a lick of sense.  No team has reportedly offered 2 1st round picks for Chris Jones and yet is he looking to settle for less money? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

His value was already set, or the Rams never would have tried to aquire him.

Exactly. The idea that it had any bearing on what Brian Burns is seeking financially is lunacy.  

Players typically don't settle for less than they think they are worth.  Of course Brian Burns is going to push for a deal similar to what Nick Bosa is asking for, because he is the one other edge rusher seeking a contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

His value was already set, or the Rams never would have tried to aquire him.

But by not trading, he now has more leverage in knowing that Carolina views him as essential, if he didn't already. It was neutral at best but it absolutely could have reduced the potential to compromise, if not nudged a number up, given the clear roster-specific valuation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns is considered a top tier pass rusher in the league, he will be paid as such.  He knows it, his agent knows it, and the Panthers know it.  Whether we refused a trade or not, Burns has the same value because he one of a few top tier pass rushers in the league and that is a premium spot in the NFL.  Once Bosa sets the market, Burns will sign

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We. Turned. Down. Two. Firsts.

Why is this so hard to figure out?

The second we did that and it was known, it meant we were going to have to overpay to keep him, we lost ALL negotiating power.

He has us over a barrel, just pay the man because keeping him on an overpay is better than losing him for nothing (wouldn’t even get a comp pick as we’d be flush with cap room that we’d use on another FA).

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Some interesting nuggets from the latest Athletic article.

https://theathletic.com/4832487/2023/09/04/panthers-brian-burns-hold-in/?source=user_shared_article

On what $$$ Burns is eyeing vs Panthers FO

"General manager Scott Fitterer has said repeatedly that he wants Burns around for the long term. But while Burns is eyeing Bosa-type money at the top end of the edge rusher market, the Panthers are seemingly more comfortable with a deal that pays Burns about $23 million a year, similar to what Maxx Crosby received (a $23.5 million annual value) when the Las Vegas Raiders extended him last year."

 

The Panthers are definitely significantly low balling him.  If they wanted that Crosby type deal they should have extended him last offseason not after we went out and exceeded it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, top dawg said:

Burns absolutely does NOT deserve Bosa money. He should NOT complain about Crosby money. That's basically in the ballpark where he needs to be.

Absolutely agree. Crosby has been a better player overall than Burns in their 4 years. Ahead of Burns in accolades and stats except a half sack less. With the way contracts go up each year, maybe a hair more than Crosby but that’s it.

Would have been nice if Hurney wasn’t a fug head and drafted Crosby, who we had in for a visit, to go along with Burns instead of Will Grier. Instead we took Grier first and Miller instead as Crosby was gone in between. I recall a few folks in here speaking highly of Crosby, a lot more than Grier and Miller.

Edited by WhoKnows
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Untouchable said:

The Panthers are definitely significantly low balling him.  If they wanted that Crosby type deal they should have extended him last offseason not after we went out and exceeded it.

Panthers aren't lowballing Burns at 23M a year.  

Reddick got 15 a year in a deal last year.  Von Miller got 20M a year in a deal last year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...