Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Bailey says Tepper isnt happy, wants changes now.


CPF4LIFE
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I have been told by multiple people this week that Frank Reich has been acting a lot less like “Frank Reich.”

Apparently he has been more unforgiving towards mistakes and has been very pointed towards players and coaches. 
 

Make of that what you will. 

war face GIF
 

Frank Reich/Bryce Young this week 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

There is absolute frustration over how the season has started and especially on how the OL/run game has performed. They are looking to make an upgrade at WR and help alleviate playing 8-9 in the box and believe the return of Corbs will have big impact. 
 

 

 

IMG_6724.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Shotgun said:

Not being able to stretch the field vertically is killing our O, makes the run game almost impossible. Also makes covering our WRs much easier, they know the ball isn't going farther than 15 yards. Until we see Young throw and complete some deeper passes the O will not improve.

It's a double edged sword because you also need the OL to block in order for a deep route to even develop.  I agree 100% though we have to test the defense and get the out of the box.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I have been told by multiple people this week that Frank Reich has been acting a lot less like “Frank Reich.”

Apparently he has been more unforgiving towards mistakes and has been very pointed towards players and coaches. 
 

Make of that what you will. 

Can’t help but feel this is all going to inevitably blow up before seasons end. Can  only hope the embarrassment of an “all star coaching staff” crashing and burning like we are that tep actually learns a fuging lesson to stay out of football operations 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I have been told by multiple people this week that Frank Reich has been acting a lot less like “Frank Reich.”

Apparently he has been more unforgiving towards mistakes and has been very pointed towards players and coaches. 
 

Make of that what you will. 

Thanks for the insight.

Can you tell me how to take it?

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hogan said:

Well, your limb broke. Correct, I didn't have to pay $40, 960 because, as friends, we laughed it off and said, "who wouldn't thunk..." The story is true. It never ceases to amaze me how people feel like they need to offer an opinion on something they know nothing about.

That said, my comment has nothing to do with "relaxing." I'm a reealist. There's no emition on my end. This is a very bad football team. They may not win one game. As far as Bryce, my assessment has nothing to do with him.

 

Dude.  We're not going to lose every game.  Yall are acting like we've just gotten our heads based in every game so far.  We have been in every game.  We have had a lead in every game.  Its been down to the 4th quarter every game.  We WILL click eventually.  Probably in the 2nd half of the season.  R-E-L-A-X

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Crown and the Claw said:

I’ve heard Hollywood Brown and/or Van Jefferson because of coaching staff’s familiarity and ability to get them up to speed quickly. Don’t really see Davante or Tee as realistic because they’re not gonna give up another one. Although wouldn’t be surprised to see a push for Higgins in free agency 

What about some kind of package involving Brian Burns?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Not being able to stretch the field vertically is killing our O, makes the run game almost impossible. Also makes covering our WRs much easier, they know the ball isn't going farther than 15 yards. Until we see Young throw and complete some deeper passes the O will not improve.

Did you see how often the Vikings were playing Cover 0 and just completely fuging our poo up last week?  Yeah....thats gonna be the blueprint to kill us until we make teams pay for being so disrespectful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...