Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kyle Bailey says Tepper isnt happy, wants changes now.


CPF4LIFE
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here’s the problem….Tepper hired a head coach (with ultimate say) before a gm, fired the head coach, kept the gm.  
 

  Chances are, if Tepper fires Reich or Fitt- the new guy will be hired based on having to work with Bryce-whether they like it or not.  And then you are back in the same weird situation 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Racist Cat Lady said:

Here’s the problem….Tepper hired a head coach (with ultimate say) before a gm, fired the head coach, kept the gm.  
 

  Chances are, if Tepper fires Reich or Fitt- the new guy will be hired based on having to work with Bryce-whether they like it or not.  And then you are back in the same weird situation 

McDaniels salvaged Tua

 

the right Coach/GM combo can turn this poo fest around

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Based on the trajectory of this season, I'm envisioning Scott being fired during the bye week, Frank handing off playcalling over the bye week, and then anything less than 5 wins (after starting 0-6 so going at least 5-6 post bye week) will mean Reich and crew are also axed.

Any given Sunday and all that, but I just don't see any way in hell there's 5 winnable games left on the schedule.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

And for those of you that think this is an overreaction on Tepper's part (even if he created it), imagine the embarrassment of knowing you're the first owner to ever go all in and trade next year's first to move up to #1, took a guy you had such conviction over that you thought he'd make you competitive, only to end up tanking worse than the year before, and now you'll forever be known as the owner that facilitated the first ever occurrence of a team picking #1 and #2 in the modern NFL draft era.

Yeah, I think that's enough shame to cause a lot of heads to roll in a lightning quick manner.

As we've discussed before - you don't trade up to #1 to tank after.  Tanking is not an option if you don't have a first in the next draft...  and yet, we look like we may go winless.  Idk if that's ever happened either...  Seriously, not even the Browns fuged up this bad, EVER.  This is as bad as it gets.  Even Burns is on social media liking oosts abiut how fuging horrible we are.  So I imagine every seat on Mint St is hot as hell.

LOL we're not going to go winless.  For fugs sake, the Broncos gave up 70 points in Week 3 and were 0-3, and they won last week.  We have been in all our games so far.  We will win a few.  Not saying thats good or anything, but we're not going to go winless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...