Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther Shopping for Number 1 caliber WR, Top Priority


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, jb2288 said:

This makes sense on why we haven’t paid Burns out yet. We can 100% get a stud #1 here if we overpay, which I think is the right move if we are all in on Bryce. 

Which STILL blows my mind that we turned down what we turned down for him last year. I literally cannot believe we were that stupid. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

I would watch out for Adams. Raiders are in the market for an edge rusher and JM’s seat is warming up.

I’m no capologist but looking at the details of Adams’ contract, it seems like Vegas would take a $40m dead cap hit if they traded him? Not sure that’s feasible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

I vaguely remember the interview I think she in not so many words said they all wanted him to play on the west coast. I don't understand the loyalty some folks still have to McCaffrey. It's kinda fishy after he was perpetually banged up his last few seasons here as the highest paid back in the league all the sudden he's like Bruce Willis in Unbreakable. I mean good for him but he didnt win poo for us so I hope the 49ers get bulldozed in the playoffs again.

I mean, this was during the Rhule tenure which is also the time when Luke retired (could’ve just been his time),  but everyone that was worth a damn noped on out of here after Tepper/Rhule came on. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

I would try the Rams again for a 1st, 2nd and Puka Nacua for Brian Burns. 

We ain't getting no teams #1 WR, not short of a Kings ransom.  Also it's too early in the season, everyone is still in playoff race yet in theory (even us).

Would we even use Puka correctly? He seems redundant to AT to me a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

normally I’d come in with my annual f no stop with the cheat codes and fuging yourself in the draft by dodging a top pick and rebuilding the correct way by doing more stupid poo that may get you a win or two 

but the Panthers have even found a way to take that from me since we don’t even have a first round pick…so that won’t even matter 

f it who cares just do whatever lol. A WR won’t make up for Tepper’s dimbass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

its somewhere here on the huddle... someone created a topic and posted the video of his mother sharing it. She said he was ready to move on and she had an idea where and she was excited. She originally said it was going to be the Rams.

It’s his mom and she mentioned the Rams who were interested. That means she was talking after we had already started the trading process. She’s a mom so she’s going to be protective and of course she’s happy if CMC is going to be closer to where they live and frequent (dad and son played at Stanford).

If she said that before we already surprised and angered CMC by putting him on the block, then maybe I’d care but it was after so I’ll still believe what came directly out of his mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Knaakedup said:

Which STILL blows my mind that we turned down what we turned down for him last year. I literally cannot believe we were that stupid. 

Yep. If we trade him now and get less than 2 firsts and a 2nd, then we may have the worst FO ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...