Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To all who wanted Richardson gone


bobcat91
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Varking said:

His casual friday was giving little pat pats on the young girls backsides lol. I think that might be part of the difference between him selling and Kraft. Kraft did his shady poo away from NFL facilities. Richardson did his at them. Plus a lack of winning makes it easier for them to force him to sell compared to Kraft with multiple rings. 

That's the hair that broke the camel's back?  Richardson had a couple of supporters in Jones and Rooney, but it seems like he fell out of favor with the rest of the League's owners.  I personally feel it was internal politics. Richardson was very old school with old money.  Anyway, had this been Jerry JONES, no way he sells the Cowboys and they haven't done anything since the mid 90's.  If it had to do with winning, Bidwell would have sold the Cardinals years ago with all the scandals they've had with a poo franchise and product.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The reality is that they wanted to fast track Tepper into the good old boys club and they knew that JR didn't have a succession plan and the team would be sold upon his passing anyway so that just hit the fast forward button on that.

I'm honestly surprised they didn't do it to Snyder first though. I'm sure Tepper would've preferred the bigger market that's closer to his New Jersey home.

^^^^This.  They knew Jerry love the League and if quietly asked to step away--notice I didn't say forced--they knew he'd likely go without a fight.

Snyder, being the prick he is, was going to go down swinging no matter how much evidence of wrongdoing there was.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TN05 said:

In hindsight, Cam was holding this dumpster fire together with duck tape for his entire time here and ever since he fell off we haven’t been able to do anything. This organization is just rotten in the front office and has been for a decade

Not really. Obviously having Cam was big but this team under JR had plenty of success (just not consistently sustained) pre-Cam

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure it does, maybe not every position and not every draft.  You have to admit the hit rate goes down the further in the draft you get.  Would you more readily find a generational talent at the #2 pick or #19 pick?  High picks are considered "busts" if they doesn't pan out, whereas guys drafted later don't have that level of scrutiny upon them.  Different expectation levels.  If Styles does indeed go #2, I already listed the rarefied air that he would be in.  Maybe he doesn't set the League on fire, but my gut feeling is he does.  Again, you don't take an off-ball LB #2 if he is just a 'really good' player.
    • To illustrate my point, I watched (and commented on the Huddle) that Rozeboom would often wait a full second (or close to it) before taking his first step.  I assume that he probably had issues with false steps, a faulty practice that can take an ILB out of the gap completely.  Watch Luke and you see a step with the snap, and rarely was it a false step.  Rozeboom may have had 100 tackles (speculating) but initial contact was 2-3 yards on the defensive side of the ball.  Luke's 100 tackles were made 1-2 yards from the LOS.  Over the course of a year, Luke was much more productive (more fumbles, fewer long gainers, more OL penalties, fewer first downs, etc) that Rozeboom, but on the stat sheet, they both had 100 tackles.  In fact, Rozeboom's inefficiency kept him on the field more (more first downs, fewer OL penalties, turnovers, and punts) so he should have MORE tackles.   I would like to see stats that break down those things.   For example again, Josh Norman was slow--4.68 or so at CB.  However, his anticipation speed was incredible.  He made as many plays as a 4.4 CB.  I had one coach (college--later became the head coach at WCU) tell me that slower players have to use their brains more to still be around.  Elite athletes can just get by on their physical superiority.  He added, "Rarely does a football player run full speed.  Most of the time, they are not, so the 40 time is misleading stat.  Smart players overcome shortcomings--when the elite athlete becomes average (slows with age, advances in level of competition) they struggle against smarter (football IQ) competition.  
    • Obviously tongue in cheek hyperbole. But we do not need a first round RB to competete for a championship. We need intelligent roster building. That to me is the complete opposite of intelligent roster building because it is a prime resource at a devalued plug and play position when we have needs across the defense.
×
×
  • Create New...