Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFT reporting Caleb Williams wants partial ownership stake in whichever franchise drafts him


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

So it doesn’t bother anyone that the “media” can report something as ridiculous as this, it sours the public perception of the player, and in 2 weeks when the redaction comes out nobody will care because the narrative is already sown in the public consciousness? 

It's a random twitter account that paid for a blue check, not exactly credentialed media. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, travisura said:

It's a random twitter account that paid for a blue check, not exactly credentialed media. 

So? The damage is already done. In this very thread it’s already being taken as “fact” and used to tarnish somebody’s reputation. Most people will read the headline, come away with a completely false narrative and move on with their day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

So? The damage is already done. In this very thread it’s already being taken as “fact” and used to tarnish somebody’s reputation. Most people will read the headline, come away with a completely false narrative and move on with their day. 

I don’t think the league would allow any active player to have ownership in a team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

So? The damage is already done. In this very thread it’s already being taken as “fact” and used to tarnish somebody’s reputation. Most people will read the headline, come away with a completely false narrative and move on with their day. 

Is it not true? The only thing I've read is that it's rehashing an old story from July. I haven't seen anything that said it wasn't true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://fansided.com/posts/caleb-williams-nfl-draft-ownership-rumor-impossible

https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/nfl/2023/10/18/23922471/caleb-williams-ownership-stake-nfl-draft-rumors-usc-football

These are two reasonable takes on the situation. It is interesting that all of a sudden this was pushed out on social media platforms and spread the week after the bad loss, even though it was based on a PFT article from July. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, IndyPanther said:

Yes, why?

Why are you even following the Panthers if you think they’re just a brand when you’re not even from here?

No serious football fan would delude themselves with that Bill Parcells bullshit ass idea that people cheer for the jersey not the guys wearing them. Of course you move on if the player changes teams, but you never forget what they did while wearing your team’s jersey. When the players suck, everything sucks. You don’t see anyone in here right now bragging about our color scheme or the team’s market value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the crux of the issue is that Caleb has a great arm and can make throws but he’s starting to get the film on him (the classic next years class is better analysis) and people are catching on that he holds on to the ball too damn long and will take sacks to avoid an incompletion. Generational talent gets thrown around too much.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I think the crux of the issue is that Caleb has a great arm and can make throws but he’s starting to get the film on him (the classic next years class is better analysis) and people are catching on that he holds on to the ball too damn long and will take sacks to avoid an incompletion. Generational talent gets thrown around too much.

Sounds familiar 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I think the crux of the issue is that Caleb has a great arm and can make throws but he’s starting to get the film on him (the classic next years class is better analysis) and people are catching on that he holds on to the ball too damn long and will take sacks to avoid an incompletion. Generational talent gets thrown around too much.

That isn't the most difficult thing for good coaches to teach out of a player of William's caliber, especially since a big reason he holds onto the ball too long in college is because he's usually able to get away with it because of how good he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Teddy2SuperBowlHeartBreaks said:

So it doesn’t bother anyone that the “media” can report something as ridiculous as this, it sours the public perception of the player, and in 2 weeks when the redaction comes out nobody will care because the narrative is already sown in the public consciousness? 

The rumor is fairly old and has solid sources from all over college football and the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...