Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Josina Anderson "Panthers have had discussions about acquiring very notable WR"


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I'd have no problem with the Panthers spending all their picks on offense this upcoming draft with most of them being for the Oline.

Who are we going to replace on the o line? We have 3 arguably 4 starters set in place already on good contracts. The only open spot is probably one of the guard spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Who are we going to replace on the o line? We have 3 arguably 4 starters set in place already on good contracts. The only open spot is probably one of the guard spots.

Need depth and if they keep the zone scheme, they need players that fit it instead of the road grading maulers the Panthers currently have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument,  that we shouldn't trade for players because the draft picks are to valuable,  is the absolutely the wrong perspective.  The draft isn't the only way to build a team. You have to use every aspect of getting talent. If they can get a good receiver in their prime, that is a great addition not just to the offense, but to the team as a whole.  This isn't  desperation. It's team building. You never stop trying to add talent. Also, just because some previous additions didn't work out, doesn't mean the team dhould stop trying to bring in talent. 

I swear yall just want something to complain about.  Damned I we do, damned if we don't.  

The team isn't going to stop trying to add talent just because some of you want Fitt gone.  The poo that falls out of your mouths, off your finger tips, is so insanely constant. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This argument,  that we shouldn't trade for players because the draft picks are to valuable,  is the absolutely the wrong perspective.  The draft isn't the only way to build a team. You have to use every aspect of getting talent. If they can get a good receiver in their prime, that is a great addition not just to the offense, but to the team as a whole.  This isn't  desperation. It's team building. You never stop trying to add talent. Also, just because some previous additions didn't work out, doesn't mean the team dhould stop trying to bring in talent. 

I swear yall just want something to complain about.  Damned I we do, damned if we don't.  

The team isn't going to stop trying to add talent just because some of you want Fitt gone.  The poo that falls out of your mouths, off your finger tips, is so insanely constant. 

Though I think the draft is the best way to build a roster, I agree with you that we have to explore every opportunity to do so, no matter who the GM is. The entire focus should be to build around Bryce, offensively and defensively. He absolutely needs an upgrade at WR and OL, however we can do that. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lurk21 said:

I could see the rams trying to package Puka and a 1st  for Burns if Aaron Donald gets his way. He has been complaining about  not having others step up on the pass rush note.  Then again they traded Jefferson, so they may of cooled on that possibility. 

It seems like they hit a grand slam with Puka and have him for 4 years on a super cheap contract, I'd be shocked to see them even consider trading him.  Maybe I'm wrong and they see their window closing on Stafford and maybe they'd trade Puka and a 1st for Burns and Chark so they still have a useable WR this year.

But just being honest, I'm not sure that would be a good trade for us, I don't think Puka is the WR we need, we need a true outside #1, preferably someone with some wheels on them.  

Puka is essentially a younger Thielen in the way he plays, that's not what we need to give Bryce since Thielen is playing that role at an elite level right now.  

I'd still probably do the trade if we had a chance, maybe we can get an additional mid round pick in return by including Chark or TMJ as well, but I don't think it should be our first choice of how to use Burns in a trade if we can help it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This argument,  that we shouldn't trade for players because the draft picks are to valuable,  is the absolutely the wrong perspective.  The draft isn't the only way to build a team. You have to use every aspect of getting talent. If they can get a good receiver in their prime, that is a great addition not just to the offense, but to the team as a whole.  This isn't  desperation. It's team building. You never stop trying to add talent. Also, just because some previous additions didn't work out, doesn't mean the team dhould stop trying to bring in talent. 

I swear yall just want something to complain about.  Damned I we do, damned if we don't.  

The team isn't going to stop trying to add talent just because some of you want Fitt gone.  The poo that falls out of your mouths, off your finger tips, is so insanely constant. 

I'm not against trading picks for players, but with how many picks we've lost over the years, particularly for players who haven't lived up to the value of the trade, we have to be very picky in trading picks for players right now.

Higgins is the only known WR even somewhat available that I'd be okay giving up anything decent, with Sutton probably being the only other WR out there that I'd give any picks for, and even that would probably be a 5th at most.

Just because we always whiff on our picks, doesn't mean we should just expect us to keep doing so.  3rd and 4th round picks for us with our draft position this upcoming year will be the type of players that if we hit on them, they can be solid players for us as rookies on cheap deals.  So if we're trading away those opportunities, they need to be for can't miss players like a Higgins, not someone like a Jeudy or Hollywood who is on an expiring contract as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Billy Love said:

Not taking two 1st round picks from Rams for Burns confirms we are indeed, dumbasses.

So I’m split on the Burns trade, he defiantly ain’t worth what he’s asking but we literally do not have a single reliable pass rusher on this team other than him. Yeah 2 first for him sound nice. But I’m still not sure I’d want to trade him for that right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

This argument,  that we shouldn't trade for players because the draft picks are to valuable,  is the absolutely the wrong perspective.  The draft isn't the only way to build a team. You have to use every aspect of getting talent. If they can get a good receiver in their prime, that is a great addition not just to the offense, but to the team as a whole.  This isn't  desperation. It's team building. You never stop trying to add talent. Also, just because some previous additions didn't work out, doesn't mean the team dhould stop trying to bring in talent. 

I swear yall just want something to complain about.  Damned I we do, damned if we don't.  

The team isn't going to stop trying to add talent just because some of you want Fitt gone.  The poo that falls out of your mouths, off your finger tips, is so insanely constant. 

What? The draft is the best way to build a team. We are 0-6, stop acting like we have a good team that doesn’t need an influx of talent. If we don’t draft we’ll at some point, we are going to be in this poo for a while.

Also, we’ve traded a ton of picks in the past few off seasons. Are we better or worse after getting rid of Rhule and replacing him with an all star staff? Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different results. We’ve been prioritizing trading away picks for several years and we are the worst team in the league over that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

It seems like they hit a grand slam with Puka and have him for 4 years on a super cheap contract, I'd be shocked to see them even consider trading him.  Maybe I'm wrong and they see their window closing on Stafford and maybe they'd trade Puka and a 1st for Burns and Chark so they still have a useable WR this year.

But just being honest, I'm not sure that would be a good trade for us, I don't think Puka is the WR we need, we need a true outside #1, preferably someone with some wheels on them.  

Puka is essentially a younger Thielen in the way he plays, that's not what we need to give Bryce since Thielen is playing that role at an elite level right now.  

I'd still probably do the trade if we had a chance, maybe we can get an additional mid round pick in return by including Chark or TMJ as well, but I don't think it should be our first choice of how to use Burns in a trade if we can help it.

I agree and we need speed to the mix!! It's a tough situation  but we definitely  have to add talent around him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

So I’m split on the Burns trade, he defiantly ain’t worth what he’s asking but we literally do not have a single reliable pass rusher on this team other than him. Yeah 2 first for him sound nice. But I’m still not sure I’d want to trade him for that right now. 

We won’t get the value now, but not trading him last year for 2 1sts and pick 36 was the big mistake. We should have prioritized weapons for a QB that we knew we’d be taking in this past draft. Signing a $30M a year edge rusher was not smart for the future instead of building around the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...