Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Guess who ended up on today's injury report...right before the trade deadline.


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Burns isn't Bosa and shouldn't be asking for that kind of money.  Here, this is a quick table comparing the two.  The line labeled Bosa (ex) is extrapolating the numbers Bosa should have when he catches up in snaps to Burns.  Burns has most of a season on Bosa due to Bosa's injury in 2020 costing him nearly the entire year.

image.png.c337bccaf610c9a75363ccf2e12f5b80.png

Their tackle numbers look really similar, but in terms of Pressure, TFL's, Sacks . . . . Bosa is just a much, much better player.  It's what people on the Huddle here keep trying to say. 

Yes, Burns plays and does things, but Bosa impacts games.  All of the impact stats are HEAVILY in his favor.  Burns doesn't make the plays that alter the games.

Burns is REALLY GOOD.  I'm not arguing that.  I'm simply pointing out that he isn't in the same stratosphere as Bosa, and shouldn't be looking for that kind of money. 

It seems that the smartest thing we could have done last spring is included Burns in the deal with Chicago.  We'd have still had a good WR in DJ, we wouldn't have his dead cap and we wouldn't have the headache of Burns right now.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GhostWhispah said:

Cause he DESERVED an extension! Bosa won't play until he got his extension and they made him the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. Fitter would NOT even offer him a reasonable but fair extension which is Burns deserves.

https://sidelionreport.com/posts/3-players-the-detroit-lions-could-trade-for-to-bolster-lagging-pass-rush/3

https://clutchpoints.com/lions-trade-2023-nfl-deadline

Problem is Burns didn't want a reasonable extension. He wants Bosa money and this season has proven he isn’t worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

Burns isn't Bosa and shouldn't be asking for that kind of money.  Here, this is a quick table comparing the two.  The line labeled Bosa (ex) is extrapolating the numbers Bosa should have when he catches up in snaps to Burns.  Burns has most of a season on Bosa due to Bosa's injury in 2020 costing him nearly the entire year.

image.png.c337bccaf610c9a75363ccf2e12f5b80.png

Their tackle numbers look really similar, but in terms of Pressure, TFL's, Sacks . . . . Bosa is just a much, much better player.  It's what people on the Huddle here keep trying to say. 

Yes, Burns plays and does things, but Bosa impacts games.  All of the impact stats are HEAVILY in his favor.  Burns doesn't make the plays that alter the games.

Burns is REALLY GOOD.  I'm not arguing that.  I'm simply pointing out that he isn't in the same stratosphere as Bosa, and shouldn't be looking for that kind of money. 

It seems that the smartest thing we could have done last spring is included Burns in the deal with Chicago.  We'd have still had a good WR in DJ, we wouldn't have his dead cap and we wouldn't have the headache of Burns right now.

If Burns was pared up with a Bosa like talent he would be dominant. He just shouldn’t be the primary player you build your line around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

If Burns was pared up with a Bosa like talent he would be dominant. He just shouldn’t be the primary player you build your line around. 

Unlike Bosa WHO IS the guy you build your line around.  Thanks for making my point.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 2.7 seconds. If he can get the ball out in under 2.7 accurately to the medium and short routes then they can have a better offense than we saw last year.  Someone said he only had 1.5. That happened more than it should have but that was not the norm for the majority of the snaps. Maybe spending $153 million buys a little better than the weak players mostly involved in those 1.5 fails. Maybe Corbett sucks as a C but let’s at least wait a couple of outings to declare it. If he is adequate at best the OL might become an asset as the year passes. Looking at you Icky. How they help him will be a big part of how well they can operate. I think he needs a lot of help. People were beating him with quickness you have to help him. Unless he just morphs into reliable.  I do think it’s on Young to protect his tackles and himself by making shallower dropbacks. Canales looks to be taking charge of QB operating procedure and pushing it more conventional which I am for.  Question on Young, what is he really good at? Because Canales keeps saying he is going to find what Young is good at and lean into that. So whatever he does best along with handing off plenty seems like the plan. I get afraid when he throws a shallow to the sideline pass of any distance, so they’ll probably do a lot of that.   
    • Did we ever get an answer on why pete bypass him for OC?
    • 2010, 2019, and 2022 are maybe top 3.
×
×
  • Create New...