Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smith-Marsette Isn’t Happy


BIGH2001
 Share

Recommended Posts

Probably has a right to be pissed. 

Thomas Brown was specifically asked about him today in his presser.   Question was in regards to the speed on ST he has been showing and if there was thoughts of potentially getting him some reps. 

He said because of Mingo's emergence and playing well, it's hard to take him off the grass.  Said Marsette was doing a nice job in practice and they would move forward with that. 

Meanwhile in reality, Mingo had 5 yards on Sunday.  All the WRs COMBINED had 43 total receiving yards Sunday.   

So yeah, maybe a well coached team would be throwing some more looks out there with more players.  They were freaking lining Sullivan the TE outside on repeat Sunday.    Which just shows they don't even want to pretend to go downfield. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 33inNC said:

Well, it's about time he actually returned a punt instead of just catching and falling. 

he had 32 return yards Sunday.  All the WRs combined had 43 yards.   Hell, let him run pointless vertical routes instead of putting Sullivan out wide.  At least a defender would have to sort of care about it. 

that being said, watch him no longer return punts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Can’t speak for his ability as a receiver but I can tell you his maturity level needs some work. I’m never a fan of tweeting your displeasure with your employers. Reeks of childish drama.

True.  But it also reeks of a clown show.   His coach was in the presser selling some bologna again about this WR group.  Especially given what occurred out there Sunday. 

I mean, he is straight up responding to Thomas Brown IMO.  And frankly, you probably don't want to be here after that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...