Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper


Pazhoosier89
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't believe either of the Teppers are actually making deals or closing transactions directly or anything of that sort.

With Dave though, I think he expresses preferences over players he wants, players he doesn't care for, how he wants things done, etc.

That's really all the meddling he or any owner has to do to royally screw things up.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you people are getting trolled.

The chance of actually making the decisions on her own is somewhere close to zero, let alone being the GM.

Just because she makes the phone call to trade up for a player doesn't mean she is making the decisions.  Do you honestly think that was her idea?  

That was a player that the front office and coaches wanted, she did the formality of making the call.  No different if you tell a staffer to make the call.

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jay Roosevelt said:

Way too many conspiracy theories on here about Nicole Tepper. I seriously doubt she has as much influence as people seem to think.

In other words, David Tepper doesn't need any help to be a terrible owner. If we are keeping Scott Fitterer it's because he's Dave's rubber stamp/proxy, not Nicole's.

why is she watching practice (by herself)?  Why is she interviewing coaching candidates?  Why is she at pro days and interviewing potential prospects?

 

add it all together and you have to assume she is giving some level of input which is crazy

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

you people are getting trolled.

The chance of actually making the decisions on her own is somewhere close to zero, let alone being the GM.

Just because she makes the phone call to trade up for a player doesn't mean she is making the decisions.  Do you honestly think that was her idea?  

That was a player that the front office and coaches wanted, she did the formality of making the call.  No different if you tell a staffer to make the call.

 

 

 

to be fair you were the same dude arguing recently that Tepper isnt a meddling owner so theres that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely no way in hell that this conspiracy is true.

It would have been leaked to the media by now.

Your sins will always find you out… Connor Stalions at Michigan, the Chicago Blackhawks covering up sexual assaults, etc.

If something this big we’re true then it would have been leaked by now.

I’m all for dragging the Tepper’s but this one is insane.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...