Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I want to be proven wrong about Bryce Young, today is the first real step


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Shocker said:

Lots of posters choking on crow in here

I remember when Kyle Allen came in and had 4 stellar games in a row.  Everyone on the board gave the man no credit and said he it wasn't a big enough sample size.  As soon as the kid had one bad game every abandoned the kid.  This is like that in reverse.  I'm holding Bryce to the same standard.  He's had one good performance.  If he can have a few more I'll see it as a sign of growth.  One game means nothing, but it is at least a good sign.

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jd12099 said:

Make sure you're keeping receipts on all the Bryce haters in this forum. They've been quiet today xD

I’ve seen more Bryce skeptics than haters. No one I’ve seen came into the season wishing for him to be a loser.
 

He had a great game but one game doesn’t undo the rest of the season. We will need to see more of this version of Bryce. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

He’s already shown us flashes of great stuff through the season but people dismiss it cause it’s not the type of stuff they wanted to see.

That being said there’s no reason to say he’s arrived after today.  Just like there was never a reason to declare him a bust after 2 games.  This story is far from told but im looking forward to seeing how the rest of it plays out. 

I would probably argue that the definition of great changes depending on who is doing the defining, and how they feel about who they are applying it to. 

If we replace great with NFL level, it is a lot easier to concede that he had a good day. 

I could root for him as an underdog but, he is no underdog. I mean, this guy had the golden ticket laid on him in high school, he is the media and corporate pick. And I looked and didn’t see why at a glance. So I started looking.

Performance only. Serious questions. I believe they are legit and I believe they have manifested on the field. Which brings us to the crossraods here. I never under any circumstances wanted to take a player that so much had to be done to accomodate them, it is about that simple. 

At that position for what they paid, it was insanity masquerading as ‘we are smarter than you’. Now they are stuck with a job on the line life or death type of situation for a skill set that is a lot closer to what you find in the bottom of the 1st through about the 3rd round. And I feel like that is generous. 

He has displayed grit and toughness, and I like a lot of what I hear (have never listened to a post game pc, it is other stuff), but it will take a lot more than that to make that arm stretch the field. It is like 2/3 or 3/4 or 7/8 whatever fraction you prefer, short of average. That will not go away. It has to be accounted for. There are things we will simpy never see as long as he is quarterback. 

Speaking of… I realy loved the sneak fwiw. Favorite play. 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're a Panthers fan you should want him to succeed. It's that simple. If you find yourself perusing various threads today you'll see the conversation on Bryce Young ends up between two groups with not much wiggle room. The next two games and next season hopefully show us the improvement and promise we seek.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Want needs to be tied to reason though. Like, you can want to win Powerball. Do you expect to win?

I’d like for him to be that guy. Do I expect it? Obviously from my posts, no. 

Now as far as what is said here, Bryce Young never told me I was an idiot  for thinking he shouldn’t be the pick. That was posters here. It isn’t hating him to negatively comment on his football ability. And I can say something good without it meaning I love him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, TN05 said:

313 yards. 60%+ completion. 2 TDs, no turnovers, game was only lost because of a poor defensive performance and officiating. After that first quarter Bryce was routinely making tight throws in places only the receivers could get them. When under pressure, he didn’t cave and often improvised for impressive results.


This is what I’ve wanted to for all year. We’ve seen flashes in a few other games, but this is the first time Young has absolutely wowed me. Here’s to many more!

Came here to say the same thing.  I've been viewed as one of his biggest detractors, and rightly so...  part of it was because I just didn't see what he did in college translating to the pros and the other half was once he was a pro, it looked exactly how I expected it to look for a guy that isn't going to be an NFL starter.

How he played yesterday was not just the most encouraged I've been, but it's the first time I was encouraged at all by his play.  And for good reason...  he finally took chances - smart ones, and located the throws in spots to give his guys a chance to make a play when the opportunity presented itself.

I also think this is a good time to point out to all of the "he's struggling because the receivers suck" folks - how'd those receivers look yesterday?  Those separation stats look a lot different after games when the QB actually gives them a chance to make a play and they make them.  How Chark looked yesterday is what he's always been capable of looking like.  He's a damn good player.  He just wasn't given legitimate chances, usually because Bryce wasn't comfortable attempting those throws in tight windows.  Same for Tremble and the rest...  Bryce has bona-fide weapons, he just wasn't comfortable using them in the way a pro QB has to use then- until yesterday.

Props to Bryce and also worth recognizing a good day at the office for Thomas Brown.  It looked like everyone was comfortable to some degree for the first time at that offensive side of the ball.  Hope they can build off of it.  I won't say I'm in on Bryce, but that at least gave me hope yesterday.  It's something to build off of.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Came here to say the same thing.  I've been viewed as one of his biggest detractors, and rightly so...  part of it was because I just didn't see what he did in college translating to the pros and the other half was once he was a pro, it looked exactly how I expected it to look for a guy that isn't going to be an NFL starter.

How he played yesterday was not just the most encouraged I've been, but it's the first time I was encouraged at all by his play.  And for good reason...  he finally took chances - smart ones, and located the throws in spots to give his guys a chance to make a play when the opportunity presented itself.

I also think this is a good time to point out to all of the "he's struggling because the receivers suck" folks - how'd those receivers look yesterday?  Those separation stats look a lot different after games when the QB actually gives them a chance to make a play and they make them.  How Chark looked yesterday is what he's always been capable of looking like.  He's a damn good player.  He just wasn't given legitimate chances, usually because Bryce wasn't comfortable attempting those throws in tight windows.  Same for Tremble and the rest...  Bryce has bona-fide weapons, he just wasn't comfortable using them in the way a pro QB has to use then- until yesterday.

Props to Bryce and also worth recognizing a good day at the office for Thomas Brown.  It looked like everyone was comfortable to some degree for the first time at that offensive side of the ball.  Hope they can build off of it.  I won't say I'm in on Bryce, but that at least gave me hope yesterday.  It's something to build off of.

Very well said.   Can’t argue with any of it.   Imo he still has a ways to go and his arm still gives me pause but at least yesterday he gave us something 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...