Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

game day thread....just in case you're watching


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

NFL can’t have a team in London permanently. The money, logistics, and tax poo doesn’t work. 
 

I don’t think the NFL is “out to get” the Panthers. I never said that. You need to take a remedial reading comprehension class. But the NFL is “out to get” highest rated games and compelling storylines all the way to the final game of the week - and one way to do that is not having team rest players. 

Their ratings will be fine, no matter who in the AFC south emrges as a winner. They don't NEED Jacksonville to keep winning. They'd much rather have Houston in the Playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hoenheim said:

Does anyone have a suggestion of how to watch the game? I'm paying for both nfl + AND Sunday ticket on YouTube and it's saying the game Is blocked in my area on BOTH services. Wtf am I even paying for all this for when the games are blocked half the time (I'm a truck driver so I'm in different areas every sunday, right now im in eastern Arkansas)

 

Screenshot_20231231_102750_YouTube.jpg

Screenshot_20231231_102704_NFL.jpg

Check your location services 

I had this problem 3 weeks ago

it should pop up and ask you to verify location the you will be fine 

log in with your phone to you tube or use the wr code on the screen

i had the situation were one of my tvs was fine. The other wasn’t 

google you tube location services 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

I think we get ripped a new ass today tbh.  We're a reliable get-right game for teams on cold streaks.

 A loss today and we are guaranteed, at best, a share of the worst record in the League for the season.  The Cardinals are only a game ahead of us somehow, it depends on what they do this week and next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Their ratings will be fine, no matter who in the AFC south emrges as a winner. They don't NEED Jacksonville to keep winning. They'd much rather have Houston in the Playoffs.

They don't care where the teams are from - they just want good, engaging football for their tv time slots. 

Houston's stadium was literally half empty the other week (when Stroud was injured and they were losing in the 4Q). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...