Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers will prioritize HC then pair him with a bright new sexy boy GM


Recommended Posts

what would be interesting is to see a list of who this firm has helped in the past and look at how that panned out.  I know the owner had Chelsea/soccer ties but they do NBA, NFL, and everything apparently 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

what would be interesting is to see a list of who this firm has helped in the past and look at how that panned out.  I know the owner had Chelsea/soccer ties but they do NBA, NFL, and everything apparently 

 

 

They helped rams, 49ers, philly, and falcons. Smith was 50/50 on getting fired and the other 3 are some of the best results you can ask. I posted their 2 star review on goggle tho.....

I mean they have to better than tepper, right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoever the HC is, Tepper needs to stop the weekly sit down meetings and let man coach his team. We also don't need Nicole Tepper helping out with the offensive line or other areas of concern as it appeared to be this year. Way too much involvement from the Teppers. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

alot of why questions come to mind because it seems like we are trying to fix something yet going about fixing it  the exact same way we fugged it up to begin with seems so well just plain stupid...

anyway I was hoping we would do things different this time around  & hire a GM then give him complete control over hiring a new coaching staff & assembling a roster.moreover a GM doesn't need a coach helping him do his job he needs the coach to focus on coaching the freaking team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this would only work with a proven HC, I see people posting this is how teams do it and other than all star, successful HCs, I don’t really see it…

I think teppers issue is he has no clue what a good GM is, course he doesn’t know what a good HC is either so who the fug knows what he’s doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gonna have to strongly disagree with you here. Here are the last 20 Super Bowls - only two of them IMO had QB that didn't play like Superman to get them there/win the game/both, and that was Peyton in 2015 and Ben in 2005. Even then they both had that ability, Peyton was just old and Ben young. That said, there were flashes in the pan like Foles in 2017 and (to a lesser degree) Flacco in 2012. But even counting that, it's 4/20. 20% odds aren't good enough and Bryce was absolutely drafted at #1 to be a guy that elevates an entire team and plays like Superman. If he can't do that then it's a failed pick, full stop. Being a poor man's Teddy doesn't cut it for a #1 overall and that's true for any team, not just Carolina.
    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
    • The Panthers aren't building a Bryce Young roster. Alabama didn't recruit personnel to fit a Bryce Young scheme. Canales' approach is to build an NFL roster (which they didn't have last season) and then cater his scheme and playcalling to what the players do best. The team is not pigeon holing itself into an offense that doesn't fit any other QB. Their goal this off-season was to provide NFL average or better talent to the offense - period. Very little to do with matching personnel for  Bryce Young's skillset or lack thereof.
×
×
  • Create New...