Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and Morgan to report to Tepper


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Who are they supposed to report to, Roger Goodell?  Jfc wait til the season starts at least before judging the new guys

Have you seen the track record of Tepper. I don't blame anyone that is rolling their eyes at this and is not happy about it.

 

We don't know what is said in those meetings but so far these events have not lead into anything good.

 

Believe me I HOPE to god Tepper learns and keeps it simple and doesn't meddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My immediate supervisor cant fire me.

We have an organizational org chart where I report to their boss.

We have a functional chart where I report to my supervisor.

 

Especially at the Sr Director/VP level and up there tend to be a lot of dotted lines in the org chart.

 

Fretting over an org chart is some pretty "I need to be mad at something so I choose this" energy

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, Tepper has put the easter eggs out in the open for all us little kids.

Hell all of us would love something, anything to be excited about. Unfortunately, we've been conditioned long enough to know how this movie ends. Will it be different this time? It sure would be nice. Am I expecting it to be? No, not really. There's just too many things that must go right to expect much more than what you saw last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jmac said:

It was supposed to be a hire to be the buffer between Tepper and the coaches.....WTF happened to that ?

Since it would be a new position they would have to interview 1 outside minority or female candidate before making the supposed move for Tillis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Have you seen the track record of Tepper. I don't blame anyone that is rolling their eyes at this and is not happy about it.

 

We don't know what is said in those meetings but so far these events have not lead into anything good.

 

Believe me I HOPE to god Tepper learns and keeps it simple and doesn't meddle.

No, I haven’t seen what Tepper is actually like in his relationships with his employees, just like everyone else on this board. So I don’t know his track record. I don’t buy into speculative narratives that get popular through repetition.
 

I know his track record for hiring the right people isn’t good, but I’m still going to be cautiously optimistic about these hires. I know he has one case of losing his cool in a dispute with someone near him in Jacksonville, that wasn’t a great look throwing a drink on someone.  Pretty much everything else people whine about is conjecture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boo hoo they have to report to the guy who signs their checks. Here’s a quick exercise to check if someone has to report to someone: can they be fired? If so, who can fire them? Tepper owns the team, no poo people report to him. Welcome to the real world 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2024 at 7:52 AM, JawnyBlaze said:

Who are th6ey supposed to report to, Roger Goodell?  Jfc wait til the season starts at least before judging the new guys

 why should a head coach or any coach for that mattet report directly to the owner ? 

just doesn't make sense because I thought that the head coach reported to the GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bandu said:

 why should a head coach or any coach for that mattet report directly to the owner ? 

just doesn't make sense because I thought that the head coach reported to the GM.

It’s not uncommon at all. You have some owners to whom the team is an investment and they’re totally hands off. Then you have owners who love the game and like to know what’s going on. Tepper is the second. Someone just posted a day or two ago here a screenshot saying they have the same situation in Atlanta with the new hc and GM reporting to Arthur blank

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PFT said it best regarding Tepper

He came in and wanted to be the rogue that did things 'his' way. 

He got embarassed. So he leaked to the press that he was taking a step back but in reality he is still going to do things 'his way'.

He will get embarassed again and hopefully by the third time he'll realize he actually needs to take a step back 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, poster also said Young or Mahomes, it would have made no difference.  If there was way to actually test that hypothetical, I would sell every belonging I have and wager that Mahomes would indeed yield different results.  Mahomes automatically changes the D coverages.  He automatically changes the threats.  He attacks and threatens a field different vastly different.   We have seen good QBs and great QBs play behind horrific OLs in a single season....and they don't default into being the worst team in the NFL.  Frank Reich was old, stubborn and not creative enough to deal with an anomaly QB like Bryce.  The best QB in the NFL wouldn't be handicapping Frank, they would be enhancing Frank.  Starting week 1, Frank didn't even trust Bryce with basics....Frank gave him I what I feel comfortable with you being able to do offense.  Which took throws and plays off the table because Bryce couldn't do early on what a bad vet in Dalton could.  Mahomes would not yield the same results. 
    • All I have to say to this really, is it sounds nice and downgrades Stroud to make Young look better is more like what this take does. Look at the WR numbers the year before and then the year with Stroud. He made them better, not the other way around. That’s my opinion. I appreciate you designating that it was yours. Many state these things as facts.
    • but what if.....and here me out....the pro Bryce Young stuff was coming from people under Fitterer.  You know, the people who are employed to feed him that input.  And they happen to all still be employed here.  when Rhule was fired I desperately wanted Fitterer fired.  It set things up for Fitterer to be the sacrificial lamb the next time things went poorly....every time we move on from a disaster, we are retaining a heavy % of the folks who helped bring the disaster we are "moving on from".  Everyone argued Fitterer probably could be great and it was all Rhule.  We are just repeating the same stuff to a degree IMO.   Panthers needed a clean slate post Rhule era.  Needed another post Frank era.  Things were just too bad or too dysfunctional IMO to be salvaging so much.   We keep failing to do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...