Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a deep qb class should the panther take one day 3?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am not saying thow in the towel on bryce at all. But I think the smart money would be to invest in some developmental guy who could provide a potential back up option should bryce falter. This is exactly why no one is making a fuss over Trey lance trade up in SF. He broke even their mistake.

In a deep class with guys like spencer rattler and Joe Milton, guys like jordan Travis floating around in day 3 i think its smart money. what say you?

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I am not saying thow in the towel on bryce at all. But I think the smart money would be to invest in some developmental guy who could provide a potential back up option should bryce falter. This is exactly why no one is making a fuss over Trey lance trade up in SF. He broke even their mistake.

In a deep class with guys like spencer rattler and Joe Milton, guys like jordan Travis floating around in day 3 i think its smart money. what say you?

To me, it’s more important that we upgrade our backup QB with a higher-end vet.

 Bring in Minshew, Tyrod, or Brissett to both mentor Bryce and also win us some games if we need them.

Bryce should not be deemed “unbenchable” this year if we have a chance to win a game and he’s struggling or hurt.

Edited by HardcoreHokie
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure why not?

 

 

49ers got Purdy as the last pick in the draft. He's not elite but has shown he can get to the SB with a talented roster.

 

Maybe we find someone better than Bryce and we don't have to take a QB the following year. You never know how these QBs will play out. I would take a chance especially if that QB has the arm talent. With good coaching he can develop into something.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. Countless examples. Just look at the SB for examples. Brock was drafted with trey lance(they traded 3 1s+ for) and starter jimmy. Andy reid made a career out of trading backup QBs(feely, kolb) for prime picks. Kirk cousin was drafted in the 4th in the same draft the wfters traded 3 1s for RGIII. 

If your trusted scouts have a 2nd round rank on player and hes still there in 5th, draft them no matter how you feel about the starter. NFL has a nearly 40% player turnover each year along with many injuries. The goal of the NFL is stock pile talent and it will work out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, micnificent28 said:

I am not saying thow in the towel on bryce at all. But I think the smart money would be to invest in some developmental guy who could provide a potential back up option should bryce falter. This is exactly why no one is making a fuss over Trey lance trade up in SF. He broke even their mistake.

In a deep class with guys like spencer rattler and Joe Milton, guys like jordan Travis floating around in day 3 i think its smart money. what say you?

I say yes, but we all know Tepper isn’t going to allow it.
 

This is an extremely deep draft at the QB position and they might fly off the board, which would help us. 

However, if Rattler is available in the third or Travis in the fourth or fifth… I’d pounce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

I say yes, but we all know Tepper isn’t going to allow it.
 

This is an extremely deep draft at the QB position and they might fly off the board, which would help us. 

However, if Rattler is available in the third or Travis in the fourth or fifth… I’d pounce.

Why wouldn't he? He's "allowed" throwing resources at QB every single year since 2020. Too much hax been one of the biggest problems. A later round puck would be the least wasteful things he's "allowed "

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

I say yes, but we all know Tepper isn’t going to allow it.
 

This is an extremely deep draft at the QB position and they might fly off the board, which would help us. 

However, if Rattler is available in the third or Travis in the fourth or fifth… I’d pounce.

Even if he is still super committed to Bryce the potential ROI on a late round QB that hits should be an easy sell to Tepper. Even if Bryce pans out if the late round QB shows promise you have a solid backup for minimal investment or you flip him for significantly more in trade value than what you spent to acquire him.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not to sure it's a solid argument to try to estimate what he will do this season, BUT he's had a solid 3 years in the league. Here's his numbers compared to Jewell's for the same time period. I can see the logic of getting a starting MLB for a (at best) WR4. AT, XL and Tmac are certainly our top 3 guys IN 2025. Certainly worth pondering.
    • Training camp just started and it's already starting... https://www.facebook.com/reel/24277303321904901/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v LOL No one believes you and you have fan pages sharing this with a "Play him or trade him" headline. Oh wee mayne. This is why no front offices wanted any part of this.
    • Honestly, it only makes sense if you're trying to chase being the best bad team you can be this year. The number one question we need answered this season is whether or not Bryce is our long-term franchise QB. Trading away a second year WR who was second on the team in catch percentage, first in yards per target, and who clearly outplayed your 1st round pick for a likely one year rental fill in LB is exactly the type of short sighted desperation moves that has made us the worst franchise in the league under Tepper. We gotta stop making these types of moves and just focus on building a good organization and a good roster. Lloyd is a JAG LB another bad team and awful defense is wavering on and a couple of Panthers fans are salivating over him. Oof. We just need to be patient and wait. Definitely make some calls around the league to teams deep at LB and see if there's an opportunity to add one for a late round pick. Definitely shop the waiver wire hard. The reality is that LB is almost certainly going to be a weakness for us this year. We weren't fixing our entire roster in one off-season and we're not fixing an overall weak positional group in late July.  If you trade for Lloyd LB is still a weakness and you've given up a young promising WR who could potentially help you answer the question of whether or not Bryce is that guy. That's bad football business.
×
×
  • Create New...