Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns Franchise Tagged

shaq

By shaq,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Trading or cutting DJax, cutting Thomas, extending Moton, extending Brown, and working out a Burns extension/trade will clear out a good bit. The first few DJax, Thomas, and Moton could happen fast IMO. Bozeman could clear up a decent amount too if we are wanting to move on from him. 

Yeah the extensions, I suppose. I'm assuming with Djax and Thomas, we'll have to spend basically whatever we save in cap space on new FA's to replace them so thats why I was saying some sideways moves. Jackson would be a decent chunk of free space but to pick up a starter would cost almost all of that $10M. Spotrac even has fuging CJ Hendersons market value at like $8M lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted

 

 

Who might be willing to trade for Burns? The Ravens would make sense, and in theory could offer their first-round pick, 30th overall, three spots ahead of Carolina's top pick right now. The Rams won't offer what they had before on Burns, but they're logically still a top suitor, and they have a bevy of picks, so they could potentially offer their second (52nd overall) and a fifth. Washington, with ample cap room to handle an extension with Burns, has an extra second and third this year, so the Commanders could package the 36th and 101st picks to add Burns, helping offset their trading Montez Sweat and Chase Young at last year's deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Buckets said:

I don't think any sane person ever said that Peppers wasn't good 

Plenty did the first time he left the team. He had that weird season where he only had 2.5 sacks and a lot of people were saying he wasn’t worth the money and played lazy whenever he finally left us. You are right that they weren’t sane, but many were saying that.

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Plenty did the first time he left the team. He had that weird season where he only had 2.5 sacks and a lot of people were saying he wasn’t worth the money and played lazy whenever he finally left us. You are right that they weren’t sane, but many were saying that.

thats some revisionist ass history right there.  And was the 2.5 sack season his mono year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheSpecialJuan Grand Master

TheSpecialJuan

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

 

Who might be willing to trade for Burns? The Ravens would make sense, and in theory could offer their first-round pick, 30th overall, three spots ahead of Carolina's top pick right now. The Rams won't offer what they had before on Burns, but they're logically still a top suitor, and they have a bevy of picks, so they could potentially offer their second (52nd overall) and a fifth. Washington, with ample cap room to handle an extension with Burns, has an extra second and third this year, so the Commanders could package the 36th and 101st picks to add Burns, helping offset their trading Montez Sweat and Chase Young at last year's deadline.

If those are the best options simply keep him easy decision 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted

The non-exclusive tag gives Morgan the bargaining power if another team doesn't offer him a deal. We're able to get him at a better deal than he's asking for.

His agent IMO is the driving force behind the top dollar deal he wants. If his agent is so damn good he should be able negotiate a deal with another team and get him what he wants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ClawOn Grand Master

ClawOn

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I hope I am too. But everything I'm hearing coming out in the press seems to indicate that the team seriously wants to keep him. 

If you want to trade him,  representing any other intention than you plan to keep him is unwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

If you want to trade him,  representing any other intention than you plan to keep him is unwise

He's been tagged. He's either kept or traded at this point.

Unless you are dumbass Dave Gettleman 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

If you want to trade him,  representing any other intention than you plan to keep him is unwise

You cannot keep this secret. You cannot tell me agents and teammates do not talk about this to friends on other teams. Anyone in any FO have already heard what's up through the grapevine. Any team interested already knows what they are willing to pay him and what they are willing to give up to do so. The Panthers have no bargaining power unless they get more than one suitor. You know that no team is giving up that much capital for Brian Burns. No amount of hype can overcome his tape. That's the bottom line. 

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, csx said:

He's been tagged. He's either kept or traded at this point.

Unless you are dumbass Dave Gettleman 

Hopefully Burns' agent last big deal wasn't trying to renegotiate super sizing his combo like Norman's. Gettleman was a dumb ass but bringing an agent with zero experience in big contract negotiations was equally as idiotic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bear Hands Grand Master

Bear Hands

Posted
Posted

The reality is always somewhere in the middle. 

No matter what we may think with our bias as fans, he's still a young (25), higher end player at a premium position (He's younger than Kenny Pickett lol)  And there are many EDGE desperate teams that are contenders who he would help put over the top.    

He's not the well-rounded defensive centerpiece we want out of an EDGE or DE talent (rather one dimensional), but he's absolutely still valuable and for at least a 1st and could probably notch out a 15-sack type season on the right team.  There are definitely some skewed perspectives in this place.  He's was a top-3 overall FA available this season by nearly every site and analyst for a reason (the respected and awful ones alike)

We're not getting 2 firsts, but we should easily get a min one.  

Now, I'm unsure if we'd necessarily be getting a 2024 1st, but I could see a 2025 and a mid-rounder this year.  Something in that ballpark.  And that's if he doesn't sign long term which still obviously seems like what we are at least putting out there. 

My longshot wish is getting a minimum 2024 3rd and 2025 1st for him.   Then you go after a Greenard or Bryce Huff long term in the $15-19 mil range.  That's roughly 10-12 mil more a year to work with for a similar output in a rebuilding environment.  Send him to a spot where he can keep doing his spider pose.      

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PantherChris
      NHL Olympics Thread (Or just Olympics in general)

      By PantherChris · Posted

      They also didn't mind it last year during four nations, or when they beat the fins lol. Sour grapes, they had 3 pf the top four players in the world on the ice when we beat them.
    • rebelrouser
      Mike Kaye: LB Devin Lloyd could be a realistic possibility

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      The tag for '26 is 28M. No way they tag him.  He is projected to be worth around 60M for 3 years so they could still try to sign him on an extension for about that amount: JagsWire   As someone else mentioned, the tag average factors in outside linebackers, aka, edge rushers, in the line backer formula.  If they would distinguish between olb and ilb, the ilb would get a lot less. 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Should Dave Canalas be on the HOT seat??

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      He didn't actually make the playoffs. We had several opportunities to clinch on our own and crapped the bed. We had to wait for Atlanta to win to get us in. We had the tie breaker in a poo division that had 3 teams finish 8-9.  If you go back and look at the games we played, we weren't a dominant offensive team under him as an OC. We beat the Jets 13-7 and barely beat the packers after they failed to convert multiple red zone trips. We relied heavily on converting 4th downs. DC was also extremely slow at recognizing trends in game and was really lacking with clock management.  Was there progress this year? Yes. But most of it was on the defensive side of the ball. Our offense was stagnant with a couple of exceptions. Any improvement from Bryce was minimal and he kept insisting on XL over Coker, and even RB distribution instead of going with the hot hand.  He may be building something, but I don't think we've seen enough to know what that is. It could go either direction. If he insists on being OC, then without a noticeable improvement, yes he needs to be on the hot seat like any OC would. The more jobs you take on the more you have to be judged on. I think he would have a longer leash if he hired a true OC and just focused in being HC.   
×
×
  • Create New...