Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

The Land Of Make Believe Wow GIF

In what world?

If we don't get a 1st plus more for Burns, then we're making a bad trade, period.  I know the fans here don't think he's worth it, but the NFL does, and that's all that matters, the teams in the league view Burns in an absurdly better light than 99.99% of the fans here.

And the Bengals 100% would take a 1st in exchange for Higgins who has asked to be traded, it doesn't sound like he has any interest in playing on the tag there there year.

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, App Panther said:

This place is going to melt down when the compensation is announced. 

Yep. A more productive player over the last couple years went for a second during the season. The Panthers will most likely get the same or less for Burns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

lol Giants fans are happy as hell on reddit.

 

At least Burns has a fanbase who embraces his talent.

 

Now we stuck with no pass rushers on the roster. Dan Morgan should be fired on the spot. Evero has to be fuming 2 of his top 3 defensive players are now gone smh.

 

 

Hell yah.......we still have DJ freaking Johnson.............

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WUnderhill said:

After Burns admitted to mailing it in last year and playing not to get injured, do you really think he’s going to do much different on the franchise tag? We can find a one dimensional 7 sack pass rusher for much cheaper.

Yep, he’s a situational pass rusher and those happy giants fans will be singing a different tune when they realize spider burns is really the invisible man 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

lol Giants fans are happy as hell on reddit.

 

At least Burns has a fanbase who embraces his talent.

 

Now we stuck with no pass rushers on the roster. Dan Morgan should be fired on the spot. Evero has to be fuming 2 of his top 3 defensive players are now gone smh.

 

 

Well they can pay 30 mill a season for 10 sacks 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...