Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jb2288 said:

I can't keep up with all the 2nd round pick swaps we did between Bryce, Giants, Rams, etc. but will just assume the trade was basically Brooks for Burns. Burns has looked like ass this year at $30M and Brooks is only $2M so if he's even just average we def won that trade. Hopefully Brooks is a mf dawg

We traded back with our 2nd first to get the Rams 2nd next year.  So it was more like Burns for Brooks plus a 2nd next year plus $30 million free in cap space which was used to sign players like Clowney and Hunt.  

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, TNPanther said:

As much as we fleeced the Giants in this trade… just imagine if the Fittiot would’ve had his brain hotdog turned on and not retardedly turned down the Rams trade.

 I predicted it from the outset. Burns looks like Everette Brown out there.

And then the Bears trade was a pretty dang good out as well. Double dumbassery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns was never going to be worth the price tag I'm glad we didn't pay it, you can get 1 sack every four games and 0 pressures from just about any URFA

And that's even with the fact he's not NYs primary rusher....

 

Only thing that sucks is not trading him in the Bryce package or to the rams....

 

(With DJ Moore our offense would be much better)

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cardiackat88. said:

I still will never, ever, EVER digest or comprehend how that flaming turd of a massive retard Fitt DID NOT take the Rams trade.

I am just absolutely flabbergasted and have no words.

I am not convinced Fitt was NOT a spy that intentionally fugged the Panthers over every chance he got.

I know, right. It was such a an obvious pull-the-damned-trigger-moment. It was one of the defining moments of Fitterer's career as a GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...