Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stop Crying about Burns


Biggdaddi1022
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'm not mad Burns is gone or his enormous new contract.  I'm upset about the compensation.  Fug Scott Fitterer. 

Bingo. Two 2nds should've been the absolute bare minimum and honestly I would've held out for their '25 1st though Morgan would've probably taken the two 2nds instead knowing Tepper might rage fire him three weeks into the season anyway.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

The only win type trade for this fanbase was going to be a 1st & late rounders. 

The reactions are expected, and the slight but not total let down in returns is as well.  

I was willing to take a 1st and....  I realized the two 1sts ship had sailed, I wasn't delusional. But a fuggin' 2nd and 5th????

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Biggdaddi1022 said:

If we gave him 150 million you would have been mad so they did the best thing could do since it wasn’t working . Plus Morgan wasn’t the one who made the choice to keep burns instead of trading him to The rams…. Not much you can do If a player hurt their value but you make countless attempts to work out a deal and they just want more than you are willing to pay….. I hated to see him go but it was needed if he wouldn’t sign a contract with us for a reasonable amount instead of being hell bent on 30 million a year ..No matter what the panthers do y’all will never be happy.

My man we are the worst team in football with the worst owner in football. What the hell are we supposed to be happy about?

 

Stop flooding this place with inspirational post. We suck get it through your thick jello brain.

 

#WeHopeTepperSellsTheTeam

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...