Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just curious, what would it take for you to trade #33 pick during draft?

CPF4LIFE

By CPF4LIFE,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted

I have been doing a lock of mocks and every time of course there is a scenario for a trade down with a team. In my opinion i wouldnt want to go lower than #40 and also would be looking for at least another 3rd rounder in this draft and a pick next year no lower than 3rd round. Thats the starter, what say you?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
Just now, CPF4LIFE said:

I have been doing a lock of mocks and every time of course there is a scenario for a trade down with a team. In my opinion i wouldnt want to go lower than #40 and also would be looking for at least another 3rd rounder in this draft and a pick next year no lower than 3rd round. Thats the starter, what say you?

40 is about as low as I would go as well, but it sorta depends on what player I am targeting at #33.  I really think we are going to be in great position to add a third rounder by trading down-still have #39.  So if you have #39 and 40, and then #65 and say, #80, that is ideal, imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
Just now, MHS831 said:

40 is about as low as I would go as well, but it sorta depends on what player I am targeting at #33.  I really think we are going to be in great position to add a third rounder by trading down-still have #39.  So if you have #39 and 40, and then #65 and say, #80, that is ideal, imo

I want to just keep both picks and not trade quality for quantity

After night 1 there’s always a small handful of players you like at the top of round 2. With two picks up at the top I’m keeping them

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I don't trade pick 33.  I don't trade any of our 2nd and 3rd round picks.  I take the best BPA.  We have a billion holes.  Take whoever is #1 on our board when it hits.  I'd prefer them to look at their offensive board and separate it from the D. 

the watered down Fitterer approach ain't going to sell with me. 

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Past 40 made it difficult prior to us having #39. 

I think we could go down to 45-50, depending on the haul. 

i would rather go with fewer earlier picks than a ton of late round guys. 

if i can get the picks to be no later than 4th round i'm ok, but the first pick i get would have to be no more than 10 picks out from the original pick. 5-8 is the sweet spot, i think.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bandu Rising Star

bandu

Posted
Posted (edited)

this team is not going to win alot of games this upcoming season if so it will not be because it has a well rounded & complete roster on both sides of the ball

 so with said if you are not just a player away say here & there from winning it makes no sense to draft anything but BPA 

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChuckWag78 Experienced

ChuckWag78

Posted
Posted

Trade back 5 spots, at the most, and pick up an additional 2nd or an equivalent player value.  

 

The only one that fits pick wise would be WAS giving us 36 & 40 for 33. 

Maybe GB with 41 & 58, but that is too late. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I have been doing a lock of mocks and every time of course there is a scenario for a trade down with a team. In my opinion i wouldnt want to go lower than #40 and also would be looking for at least another 3rd rounder in this draft and a pick next year no lower than 3rd round. Thats the starter, what say you?

No lower than the 1st half of the 2nd and I'd want at least a 2nd and 3rd from an Arizona caliber team to move at all.

A future 25 1st from an Arizona, Cleveland, LV, or Denver would be an instant yes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Veteran

Growl

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, DeSim said:

This

the guys 25-40 are generally all really similar, having two picks in that range isn’t too bad and the team is in a position where they are going to have to make up ground on this rebuild, so I probably wouldn’t implode if they turned it down.

but an extra 1 to bandage the 2 were missing next season is probably more value 

in any case I don’t think anyone is actually offering a future 1 for anybody in this class 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • rayzor
      Another Bryce breakdown

      By rayzor · Posted

      then we're stuck.  tbh, at this point i would settle for just making it interesting. forget winning a superbowl for now. just get a team that can win games consistently and hope that it's enough to get to the big dance.  we want superman. we aren't getting superman. we had him and we blew our chance with him.  find a way make it work and hope that we can with this little guy and quit wishing our lives away for the second coming of superman. it just ain't happening.
    • KSpan
      Another Bryce breakdown

      By KSpan · Posted

      Gonna have to strongly disagree with you here. Here are the last 20 Super Bowls - only two of them IMO had QB that didn't play like Superman to get them there/win the game/both, and that was Peyton in 2015 and Ben in 2005. Even then they both had that ability, Peyton was just old and Ben young. That said, there were flashes in the pan like Foles in 2017 and (to a lesser degree) Flacco in 2012. But even counting that, it's 4/20. 20% odds aren't good enough and Bryce was absolutely drafted at #1 to be a guy that elevates an entire team and plays like Superman. If he can't do that then it's a failed pick, full stop. Being a poor man's Teddy doesn't cut it for a #1 overall and that's true for any team, not just Carolina.
    • rayzor
      Another Bryce breakdown

      By rayzor · Posted

      the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
×
×
  • Create New...