Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For those who wanted Bill Belichick


Recommended Posts

Kraft did Bill dirty lol

ESPN reports Bill Belichick did not demand full control of the Falcons before being turned down for the team’s head coaching vacancy. 
 
ESPN reporters, including Jeremy Fowler, confirmed what Falcons owner Arthur Blank had said in February after the team went with Raheem Morris over Belichick, the second winningest coach in NFL history. Belichick had expressed willingness to work closely with Atlanta’s front office, including general manager Terry Fontenot. He had not — as some had assumed — demanded control of all team operations. Blank was leaning toward hiring Belichick, according to ESPN, before talking with Patriots owner Robert Kraft, who warned Blank not to trust Belichick. A source close to Kraft told ESPN the Pats owner “found Bill to be extremely difficult and obstinate and kind of stubborn and, in the end, not worthy of his trust. And also very, very, very arrogant.” Other teams, including the Titans, were turned off by what Belichick had done to the New England offense in the years after parting ways with Tom Brady. Belichick, per ESPN, will pursue head coaching vacancies next January, including, possibly, the Cowboys.
Edited by Lame Duck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, he's an old fart---who has earned his stripes and rings---who is stuck in his ways. Teams should've already known that before they brought him in. 

I heard on the radio that Kraft and Blank denied that he made any disparaging remarks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I mean, he's an old fart---who has earned his stripes and rings---who is stuck in his ways. Teams should've already known that before they brought him in. 

I heard on the radio that Kraft and Blank denied that he made any disparaging remarks.

Offensively, maybe, I don't know, the pats offense was a mess once mcdaniels and Brady left and he did some really dumb and weird things to replace them - but defensively? Dude still has it and is one of the most adaptable/brilliant defensive minds in the game.

I haven't watched it, but apparently the new Pats docuseries threw a ton of unnecessary shade Bill's way, so much so that former players were jumping to his defense for the way he was portrayed in the show.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, McDaniels offense never looked all that good without Brady.  There were some short stints where a New England backup made the offense work, but certainly no extended periods of success for the McDaniels offense without Brady.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

I'm sure he's not wrong but he's got a lot of nerve. 

I'd tend to side with the Patriots owner just not wanting to look foolish by getting rid of the GOAT (most consider him that)....and him going on to do better for someone else than what NE is going to do.  And I'd lay money Bill in Atl would out perform NE. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is too old to give thje HC job to, for my money. That, and he is so much of a control freak from what people say.  But he is a brilliant football guy. 

 I would think giving him total control of the football operations could be a good thing, but just about every guy from his tree, which is who he would likely turn to for a HC, is a big failure. So that would be big one in the negative column.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really a huge fan of Bill but this is hilarious. 

I'm really not expecting the Jerrod Mayo era to accomplish much. You're using one of Bill's guys to run a system that Bill built and tailored for years. They are just trying to avoid a complete rebuild. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

The greatness of Tom Brady just overshadowed the ineptitude of Bill Belichek. Once Brady left, he won a superbowl with Tampa and Patriots have been in the gutter. BB is a fraud. 

stupid simplistic way of looking at things. belichick is a cheater and an asshole but he's also easily one of the top football minds ever and it was him who developed brady from nobody to star. they won 4 championships where brady didn't contribute significantly. the game passed belichick by and his being an asshole started to rub people the wrong way in NE causing disfunction across the board. brady went to a stacked team with a great HC and weaseled another ring (i.e. pulled a LeBron) in a weird covid year. HC is responsible for winning and should be the only one (well and GM/front office) judged by team results. QB is responsible for his play and should be judged by his play alone (stats to a degree, but moreso the eye test), not team results. brady was a very good quarterback who was in great situations his entire career. belichick created those great situations for nearly 2 decades before becoming washed up in old age and with a changing landscape in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Valid points.  This article to me explained why they might take the chance with 2 proven veteran Guards and focus limited resources elsewhere.  If you sign a free agent, you spend $10m more than you are paying Corbett and Christensen.  If you draft a C, you have a rookie QB on the LOS in front of Bryce.  Maybe this is their only practical option, since there were many other needs that could not be staffed by currently rostered vets or rookies.  For example, they wanted a "type" at RB.  I said it before--if you look at RB and say, "Chuba had 900 yards behind a bad line!" that would be a great point.  However, he was very weak as a pass catcher and pass blocker when he arrived--he has shown promise as a pass catcher and some growth as a pass blocker.  In 2023, one site rated him the 25th best overall RB in the NFL among the top 72 "starters."  https://www.nfl.com/news/rb-index-ranking-all-72-starting-running-backs-from-the-2023-nfl-season Brooks is elite at Running, receiving, and is good at blocking.  We are better, and the pass catching with his YAC keeps defenses more honest that Chuba did.  How many sacks came after Chuba missed his block?  I dunno, but I saw it more than a few times.  We could not bring in a TE to find a weapon for Bryce.  We had to draft one.  So we had to draft WR, RB, and TE because we had no real options.  So if you look at the big picture, based on the information in the article as foundational knowledge of the C position, the fact that Corbett has never played center is not as important as his ability to play it.  But yes, it is not a given and it is risky--but it is one of the few positions we could upgrade (since we signed 2 stud Gs) with players already on the roster.  It is not ideal, but rebuilding a team with so many holes is impossible in one offseason.  When you laid out the options at every position and looked at the available cap room, this is probably the best option for the Panthers so they can address other needs where there are no options on the roster.
    • Yeah, I'm with you here. Nothing is 100% but so far I've been impressed by our new leaders. I thought the draft moves were great. I can't believe we got a 2nd next season and still got our targets with our first 2 picks. That was badass. Morgan is a dawg too. We can't forget that. Just look at those eyes. Morgan is intense.  
×
×
  • Create New...