Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the benefit to benching starters for the preseason?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

A) They recognize there is no depth at all behind the starters.

B) They have no money and are trying to get guys reps because if we get thin somewhere this season there isn't much money for outside help.

C) Trying to prevent any injuries to the starting group so item B (see above) does not happen. 

 

Not ideal, but they are playing it safe.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Not according to all the other games I watched, but okay.

Yet other teams have sat their starters. 

The Jets sat their starters. Mr Rogers hasn't played significant football in almost 2 years.  

Yet they weren't worried about him. 

I know...he wasn't a rookie last year. He only didn't play at all. 

If you're going to talk out of your ass, please Don't speak like it's factual. 

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yet other teams have sat their starters. 

The Jets sat their starters. Mr Rogers hasn't played significant football in almost 2 years.  

Yet they weren't worried about him. 

I know...he wasn't a rookie last year. He only didn't play at all. 

If you're going to talk out of your ass, please Don't speak like it's factual. 

Hey no need to be hostile.  I said the other games I watched

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoyed the starters so much last year in preseason. Those extra 8 reps obviously were the key to Young's stellar rookie year.

 

I resisted and complained for my selfish reasons of wanting to witness what it will look like. Then I let it marinate a while and opened up to it. I can see some reasons for it. My entertainment, not one of those reasons.

The people that understand we have a new paradigm are looking for ways to exploit it. They might be finding it.

Really sucks for the fans though, now the first couple of series are just like the rest of the game,.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Caneles doesn't think Bryce can get any better ,and has seen all he needs to from him 

But if week 1 is the embarrassment we think it will be, he will face questions of why Bryce didn't play in pre-season , after admitting he did no training and just played video games all off season 

Can't we just cut this mistake and move on from the 2023 draft already 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

Maybe Caneles doesn't think Bryce can get any better ,and has seen all he needs to from him 

But if week 1 is the embarrassment we think it will be, he will face questions of why Bryce didn't play in pre-season , after admitting he did no training and just played video games all off season 

Can't we just cut this mistake and move on from the 2023 draft already 

Playing video games, huh?  Is this the guy we sold the farm for?  What are his positives again?  Some leader. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saints game plan on defense is pretty easy. Send the house the entire first half and reevaluate at halftime. 

It’s a no win for the Panthers at this point. No starting line or Bryce screams weakness. Showing how weak in preseason doesn’t help the cause.

It’s send the house. Only thing changing this is if they get burned with some nasty screens, toss sweeps or end arounds that the CB or safety overplays. This is where Canales has the chance to really impress me. I’m not sure the inside run has a chance in hell. It’ll be 2nd and 11 at best. Starting the game with a screen would be epic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preseason have nothing to do with live reps.  They are meaningless games meant to allow the owners to sell more tickets.  in the past, the starters rarely played until the 3rd and then sat out the last preseason game. They do give the backups playing time and a chance to show they belong on the team or any team before cuts.  The coaches know what they have.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really thought they’d play the starters some. I guess the question is how valuable are a couple of series against the Jets backups versus the potential for injuries. It’s benefit-risk-analysis I guess. It’s one of those things where the coaches can’t win unless the starters go out and look great and stay healthy. Even then folks would point out it was against backups so…

I guess they felt like the scrimmage and regular practices are all they need to evaluate the 1s. 
 

 

Edited by Iceup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My long and rambling post:   The guy is all heart, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he came back even better next year. He’s exactly the guy you lock up. The money won’t ever change the way he plays.  It was a big fumble, but what 1,000 yard back fumbles once in an entire season?  Pride. This team is FINALLY seeing guys who obviously take the game very seriously. Hunt, Chuba, Thielen, Brown, Horn (CB), Coker, Bryce (IMHO). Bye bye, Spider-Man. I don’t see these dudes being OK with teammates half-assing practice or in games. I can see Brown and Horn coming over to talk to somebody.  Good team? Ummm, maybe, but will still likely lose more close games than they win unless this last draft turns in to LOB part 2. That’s a stretch.  Pretty good/decent team. Yes. They finished the season as a pretty good team. I know I sound like a broken record harping back to it, but going in to ATL and putting a 40 burger on them en route to an OT win. A bad Panthers team would have had their brakes beaten off. We’ve seen it.  Rose colored glasses on and bonging a 40 of hopium: There are watershed moments that occur that change the course of franchises, both good and bad. If Fox doesn’t pull Rodney at halftime, the epic journey that was 2003 never happens. On the negative side, Cam taking that one hit from Watt was the end of any and all Panthers relevancy and we’ve been the biggest losers in all of pro sports as a result. Watershed moments. LOB draft. Vinny goes down and the goat is born.  Will the ATL game be the spark that this franchise has desperately needed? Could it be that they hit the mega million jackpot with Princley and Scourton as eat QBs for breakfast? Sure would be nice having 2 all-pro edge guys on the cheap for the next 4 years.  A lot of unknowns, but at least it actually feels  fun again. 
    • Ok LT and Petersen are a cut above everyone else to me cmc and Faulk are interchangeable on this list.  though Faulk was better career wise
    • Maybe faked was too strong of a word.  "Milked" may be the better way to call it. 
×
×
  • Create New...