Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young and those close to him "very shocked" at the organization's decision to bench him.


FutureDynasty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Dave Canales literally stood in front of the masses and said Bryce was their guy and starting vs Oakland  yesterday.  No dancing, hesitation, or leaving a door cracked to tape.

so given THAT? I could see team Bryce surprised it came today.  Mentally you got at least another week after Dave spoke on it yesterday. 

I mean I would have benched him sooner.  He needed to be benched.  But folks are in pile on mode.  EVERYONE here was surprised too given what the HC said yesterday 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Dave Canales literally stood in front of the masses and said Bryce was their guy and starting vs Oakland  yesterday.  No dancing, hesitation, or leaving a door cracked to tape.

so given THAT? I could see team Bryce surprised it came today.  Mentally you got at least another week after Dave spoke on it yesterday. 

I mean I would have benched him sooner.  He needed to be benched.  But folks are in pile on mode.  EVERYONE here was surprised too given what the HC said yesterday 

I do think Canales should have benched him the second half yesterday when we still had a chance to get something going.  We were running the ball well, Bryce was the worst player on team by far. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

i said this in the other thread but this is college football poo

no one cares about your family dude. this isn't alabama. no one is worried about upsetting your high school coach and not getting recruits.

this is absolute bitch made behavior from bryce

Yeah this is just more weakness from a physically and emotionally weak little man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, NAS said:

I do think Canales should have benched him the second half yesterday when we still had a chance to get something going.  We were running the ball well, Bryce was the worst player on team by far. 

100% benched at half.  But frankly, you could also argue Dave Canales should have been benched too.  That pathetic drive to end the 2nd q is still his.  Then the 2nd half happened   He is the calling plays.  He has total power.   They weren’t trying to win or be competitive. 

Canales management of everything hasn’t been impressive at all.  Started with this pointless and wasted preseason opportunities.  Everyone in pile on Bryce mode which is fine but our new HC getting off light here IMO

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

i said this in the other thread but this is college football poo

no one cares about your family dude. this isn't alabama. no one is worried about upsetting your high school coach and not getting recruits.

this is absolute bitch made behavior from bryce

Most young athletes these days are baby poo soft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...