Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RUMOR: Bryce Young 'pissed' at being benched for Andy Dalton


FutureDynasty
 Share

Recommended Posts

Lol. Little Ray of sunshine that I am, it is my duty to point out that he got mad once before 

Bears game last year he went off, reports said. Actually raised his voice and cursed too  Since then, starting week 11 with Dallas: 4 passing TDS, 4 Ints, 1 rushing TD  

10 games  See, Canales was right about that negative motivation lolololol. 

But I’m glad he got mad. He needs to channel it. The shock therapy begins. 
 

Me, they used to mess with me to get me pissed off because they knew I played better that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he's pissed the benching was effective at least in the motivational aspect. Although him and Canales both said they don't thrive off negative motivation or something. I hope that was just off season BS fluff. Dalton made it clear that he's been give up on before and had to prove himself, Josey said it's a performance based business. Maybe they're just trying to give the kid a wake up call after all the coddling didn't work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean it's good to see something from him on the emotion scale but it shouldn't have taken this. Why was he not "pissed off" that his team was getting blown off the field week in and week out and he was a big part of why? Maybe instead of telling the media how upset you are through your agent/mom & dad now would be a good time to start putting in some of that hard work to improve your craft that didn't happen in the offseason.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Josh Rosen had prototypical size and physical talent. He was just a complete cocky asshole who thought this whole NFL QB thing was gonna be easy because he was just so damn good.

I get that, but all of the analyst and talking heads are saying that we are the problem! My hope is there is a GM that feels the same way and is dumb with his draft picks.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

I get that, but all of the analyst and talking heads are saying that we are the problem! My hope is there is a GM that feels the same way and is dumb with his draft picks.

All the coaches Bryce has had in the NFL have had success at other places.

Bryce is the one that has never had success in the NFL. 

He cant play at this level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...