Start Bryce from here on out….

[jfra78]

His teade value only goes down if we play him

[The Lobo]

Wait weren’t you talking massive poo about Bryce just a couple weeks ago? 

[TN05]

57 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

Season is done

 

need to see if there’s ANY improvement (doubtful)

 

having him at the helm is a guaranteed #1 overall pick, it’s the least he can do for us

So you want to see us lose 38-0 every game?

[Newtcase]

You shitpost a lot but this is epic poo posting.

[carpanfan96]

Oh hell no, I can’t stand to watch him play another down of football again. Just no, never again. 

[App Panther]

You can always tell how dumb someone is by how short their memory is.

[ProcessBlue2]

No.

I care more about the development of of the young guys on the offense. They won't get that with Bryce. 

I would put Plummer in before I put Bryce in, because there is at least a 0.001% chance that he can be developed. Bryce sucks, and that just is what it is.

Edited October 14, 2024 by ProcessBlue2

[Bigdaddy8523]

Bryce is poo on the bottom of our teams shoe and we can't afford to have it there. It's too many young players not getting evaluated trying to save him and he's not saveable.XL looked terrible the 1st two weeks. Competent QB play he looks like the future. Chubba can run free because the D can't stack the box. Sanders is coming along. Brooks may play this season. Johnson looks like a steal with the trade. So go back to unwatchable football to save a boat anchor naw. 

[GoobyPls]

We are gonna have throw him out there sooner or later.

[kungfoodude]

This is dumb. Our rookies need to be evaluated since we invested so heavily in offense. This is impossible starting Bryce.

He should not see the field again this year barring injury.

The focus should be on guys like Legette, Sanders, Coker, etc.

[Davidson Deac II]

If the object is to win a Super Bowl, getting the number one overall pick is irrelevant.  If memory serves, the last overall #1 pick to win a SB is Matt Stafford, and he didn't win it on the team that picked him.  Joe Burrow and Cam Newton did come close though.  

[CPF4LIFE]

2 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

If the object is to win a Super Bowl, getting the number one overall pick is irrelevant.  If memory serves, the last overall #1 pick to win a SB is Matt Stafford, and he didn't win it on the team that picked him.  Joe Burrow and Cam Newton did come close though.  

Were gonna end up getting the number 1 pick anyway because of how bad our defense is. Dont know why people can't see that. 

[Urrymonster2]

Absolutely not

Youve got to develop what we’ve got to stop this perpetual decline of players.

Young stops that completely and we have scrubs on defence. The only thing that matters is developing our total offence

Edited October 14, 2024 by Urrymonster2

[DaveThePanther2008]

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

This is dumb. Our rookies need to be evaluated since we invested so heavily in offense. This is impossible starting Bryce.

He should not see the field again this year barring injury.

The focus should be on guys like Legette, Sanders, Coker, etc.

Definitely. Our focus should be on getting these guys reps with a competent QB. 

I was a little down on Sanders because he seemed overwhelmed by position. I didn't realize he's on 21. However after watching Thomas look like a turtle running a route on that interception I'd rather see Sanders in there more often just to keep Thomas off the field. 

XL is showing growth and that TD should be a "GOT MOSSED" highlight. This shows there in potential. Coker was a good find and will continue to grow. I am hoping Brooks comes off the IR and gets some snaps. 

All of this goes to waste if we put Young in there. We need to suck it up and admit it was a terrible pick and move on. Trade him and let him restart somewhere else. Young's happy feet will hinder the growth of the rest of the offense.