Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Diontae Johnson to Ravens


ChuckWag78
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

Not sure why you're saying we gave Pittsburgh a 5th, we gave them a 6th, pick #178 to be exact which they used to draft Logan Lee.  I don't need mental gymnastics, picks don't cancel each other out, they become real people.  Michael Jackson is a real person on this roster.

What we gave is: Donte Jackson, 2024 #178 (became Logan Lee), Diontae Johnson, 2025 6th and 9.3 million dollars.

What we received is: 2024 #240 -> Michael Barrett -> Michael Jackson, 2025 5th, and 7 games played by Diontae Johnson as a Panther.

 

 

 

You’re right. The article I read said a 5th. It was the first pick in the 6th so basically the same as the 5th we’ll get from Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

heck, I'd rather Morgan of just cut him and called him a toxic bum on his way out.   Screw him right back if he was being problematic at his redemption stop.  Screw trading him for for that.  

I didn't expect much.  But a pick swap? Morgan couldn't even negotiate a 6th on it's own? 

Reminds of that clip of Morgan trying to trade Burns that was caught on camera.  If that's his sales technique....he should hire someone to do it for him. 

trade him to the pats or titans just to say eff you

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I just saw the comments on the Ravens board and they are basically laughing at us for paying most of his salary lmao

 

We are that team that everyone just laughs at apparently. One guys said "the Panthers always hooks us up" smh

Yeah that is bad. Looks like we bought a 5th round draft pick with our cap space, that's about it.

I do like completely's idea of a send him to Siberia type of deal. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, csx said:

Why would you expect much more for a half season rental?

Ravens fan aren't in love with it. They wanted defense and say they got WR depth instead.

Yeah for real, it’s not that they can’t Score they are having issues stopping others from scoring.

This is just a meh move on their end. Plus so what if we are paying him still this year. He costs nothing going forward..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I just saw the comments on the Ravens board and they are basically laughing at us for paying most of his salary lmao

 

We are that team that everyone just laughs at apparently. One guys said "the Panthers always hooks us up" smh

Pretty sure it’s mostly his signing bonus. Looks like we saved $4 million trading him off. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...